And everyday….
Number 1, be a good consumer:
Boycott Israel
![[Hitleresque.jpg]](https://i0.wp.com/2.bp.blogspot.com/_SC_870azdTU/SV9pn-ihzfI/AAAAAAAANlA/YXkG2-0AbdY/s1600/Hitleresque.jpg)
Buy no Israeli goods
Nabka
Read more: Symbols, Hand Signs and Enduring Lies
And remember:
Because I am:
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: israel, palestine | Leave a comment »
Inspired by the film Gandhi.
My most fervent wish:
“NEHRU (pleadingly): What do you want?
GANDHI (a moment): That the fighting will stop – that you make me believe it will never start again.”
Other scenes that had a profound effect upon me:
“Edward R. Murrow, who sits on the makeshift platform, a microphone marked “CBS” before him, describing the procession as technicians and staff move quietly around him.
MURROW (clipped, weighted): . . . The object of this massive tribute died as he had always lived – a private man without wealth, without property, without official title or office . . .
KINGSWAY. NEW DELHI. EXTERIOR. DAY.
As the cortege continues on its way, we get shots of the marching soldiers, of the faces of Sikhs, and Tamils, Anglo-Indians, Moslems from the north, Marathas from the south, blue-eyed Parsees, dark-skinned Keralans . . .
MURROW’S VOICE-OVER: Mahatma Gandhi was not a commander of great armies nor ruler of vast lands, he could boast no scientific achievements, no artistic gift . . . Yet men, governments and dignitaries from all over the world have joined hands today to pay homage to this little brown man in the loincloth who led his country to freedom . . .
We see the throng, following the weapon-carrier bier of Gandhi as it slowly inches its way along the Kingsway. Mountbatten, tall, handsome, bemedalled, walks at the head of dignitaries from many lands . . . and behind them a broad mass of Indians. For a moment we see their sandalled feet moving along the roadway and realize their quiet, rhythmic shuffling is the only noise this vast assemblage has produced.
MURROW’S VOICE-OVER: Pope Pius, the Archbishop of Canterbury, President Truman, Chiang Kai-shek, The Foreign Minister of Russia, the President of France . . . are among the millions here and abroad who have lamented his passing. In the words of General George C. Marshall, the American Secretary of State, “Mahatma Gandhi had become the spokesman for the conscience of mankind . . .”
In the crowd following the bier we pick out the tall, English figure of Mirabehn, dressed in a sari, her face taut in a grief that seems ready to break like the Ganges in flood. Near her a tall, heavy-set man, Germanic, still powerful of build and mien though his white hair and deep lines suggest a man well into his sixties (Kallenbach). He too marches with a kind of numb air of loss that is too personal for national mourning.
On the edge of the street an American newspaperman (Walker) watches as the bier passes him. He has been making notes, but his hand stops now and we see the profile of Gandhi from his point of view as the weapon-carrier silently rolls by. It is personal, close. Walker clenches his teeth and there is moisture in his eyes as he looks down. He tries to bring his attention to his pad again, but his heart is not in it and he stares with hollow emptiness at the street and the horde of passing feet following the bier.
MURROW’S VOICE-OVER: . . . a man who made humility and simple truth more powerful than empires.” And Albert Einstein added, “Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.”
Yes, it is hard to believe given the world we live in today.
***********************
“CHARLIE: What do you want me to do?
Gandhi looks up – his anger, his determination there, but then broken by a hopeless sigh.
GANDHI: I think, Charlie, that you can help us most by taking that assignment you’ve been offered in Fiji.
Charlie is stunned, and obviously hurt. Gandhi proceeds more gently.
GANDHI: I have to be sure – they have to be sure – that what we do can be done by Indians . . . alone.
And now Charlie understands. Gandhi smiles; warmth, and sadness. Then he speaks with a determined purposefulness, a friend’s trust.
GANDHI: But you know the strategy. The world is full of people who will despise what’s happening here. It is their strength we need. Before you go, you could start us in the right direction.
He has taken some scratched notes from under the bedding and handed them to Charlie. Charlie nods. He sighs, and rises slowly.
CHARLIE: I must leave from Calcutta, and soon. You’ll have to say goodbye to Ba for me.
Gandhi rises, glancing wryly at the prison walls. He nods.
GANDHI: When I get the chance.
And now he faces Charlie; this is the moment of farewell.
CHARLIE: Well, I –
He doesn’t know what to say, how to say it. Gandhi meets his eyes – a smile that shelters Charlie’s vulnerability, returns his love.
GANDHI: There are no goodbyes for us, Charlie. Wherever you are, you will always be in my heart . . .
The very English, very steadfast Charlie fights to contain his emotions.”
As do I!
****************************
“MIRABEHN (her own honesty): I don’t know . . . I know you are right. I don’t know that this is right.
Gandhi signals her down to him. She bends so she is looking at the floor and he is speaking almost into her ear.
GANDHI (hoarse, strained): When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won.
We intercut their faces, very close, as he speaks.
GANDHI: There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible. But in the end they always fall. Think of it – always . . . When you are in doubt that that is God’s way, the way the world is meant to be . . . think of that.
During the very last of it Mirabehn has turned her face to him, touched with emotion.
GANDHI (the paternal smile): And then – try to do it His way. (A tear runs down Mirabehn’s face. She touches his shoulder. Gandhi just leans his head back in exhaustion.) And now – could I have another feast of lemon juice?
Mirabehn straightens up, smiling, wiping the tear from her cheek”
********************
“WALKER: “They walked, with heads up, without music, or cheering, or any hope of escape from injury or death.” (His voice is taut, harshly professional.) “It went on and on and on. Women carried the wounded bodies from the ditch until they dropped from exhaustion. But still it went on.”
He shifts the mangled notes and comes to his last paragraph. He speaks it trying only half successfully to keep the emotion from his voice.
WALKER: “Whatever moral ascendance the West held was lost today. India is free for she has taken all that steel and cruelty can give, and she has neither cringed nor retreated.”
***************************************
“BOURKE-WHITE: But do you really believe you could use non-violence against someone like Hitler?
GANDHI (a thoughtful pause): Not without defeats – and great pain. (He looks at her.) But are there no defeats in this war – no pain? (For a moment the thought hangs, and then Gandhi takes their hands back to the spinning.) What you cannot do is accept injustice. From Hitler – or anyone. You must make the injustice visible – be prepared to die like a soldier to do so.”
GANDHI: Every enemy is a human being – even the worst of them. And he believes he is right and you are a beast. (And now a little smile.) And if you beat him over the head you will only convince him. But you suffer, to show him that he is wrong, your sacrifice creates an atmosphere of understanding – if not with him, then in the hearts of the rest of the community on whom he depends.
Bourke-White looks at him and there is enough sense in this argument to give her pause.
GANDHI: If you are right, you will win – after much pain. (He looks at her, then smiles in his own ironic way.) If you are wrong, well, then, only you will suffer the blows.
She stares at him, and we know she thinks him much more profound than she had thought initially.”
********************
“HINDU YOUTH: Bapu – please. Don’t do it!
They are all awed, timid even in his actual presence, and the mood of their gathering has changed altogether. Gandhi looks at the youth and the line of others.
GANDHI (impatiently): What do you want me not to do? Not to meet with Mr. Jinnah? (Fiercely) I am a Muslim! (He stares at them, then relents.) And a Hindu, and a Christian and a Jew – and so are all of you. When you wave those flags and shout you send fear into the hearts of your brothers.
He sweeps them sternly with his eyes, all his fatigue and strain showing.
GANDHI: This is not the India I want. Stop it. For God’s sake, stop it.”
***********************
“(Nahari) lingers. Suddenly he moves violently toward Gandhi, taking a flat piece of Indian bread (chapati) from his trousers and tossing it forcefully on Gandhi.
NAHARI: Eat.
Mirabehn and Azad start to move toward him – the man looks immensely strong and immensely unstable. But Gandhi holds up a shaking hand, stopping them. Nahari’s face is knotted in emotion, half anger, half almost a child’s fear – but there is a wild menace in that instability.
NAHARI: Eat! I am going to hell – but not with your death on my soul.
GANDHI: Only God decides who goes to hell . . .
NAHARI (stiffening, aggressive): I – I killed a child . . . (Then an anguished defiance) I smashed his head against a wall.
Gandhi stares at him, breathless.
GANDHI (in a fearful whisper): Why? Why?
It is as though the man has told him of some terrible self-inflicted wound.
NAHARI (tears now – and wrath): They killed my son – my boy!
Almost reflexively he holds his hand out to indicate the height of his son. He glares at Suhrawardy and then back at Gandhi.
NAHARI: The Muslims killed my son . . . they killed him.
He is sobbing, but in his anger it seems almost as though he means to kill Gandhi in retaliation. A long moment, as Gandhi meets his pain and wrath. Then
GANDHI: I know a way out of hell.
Nahari sneers, but there is just a flicker of desperate curiosity.
GANDHI: Find a child – a child whose mother and father have been killed. A little boy – about this high.
He raises his hand to the height Nahari has indicated as his son’s.
GANDHI: . . . and raise him – as your own.
Nahari has listened. His face almost cracks – it is a chink of light, but it does not illumine his darkness.
GANDHI: Only be sure . . . that he is a Muslim. And that you raise him as one.
And now the light falls on Nahari. His face stiffens, he swallows, fighting any show of emotion; then he turns to go. But he takes only a step and he turns back, going to his knees, the sobs breaking again and again from his heaving body as he holds his head to Gandhi’s feet”
************************
“BOURKE-WHITE: There’s a sadness in him.
It’s an observation – and a question. Mirabehn accedes gravely.
MIRABEHN: He thinks he’s failed.
Bourke-White stares at her, then turns to look out at him.
BOURKE-WHITE: Why? My God, if anything’s proved him right, it’s what’s happened these last months . . .
Mirabehn nods, but she keeps on spinning and tries to sound cynically resigned but her innate emotionalism keeps breaking through in her voice and on her face…. It is laced with pain.
MIRABEHN: I am blinded by my love of him, but I think when we most needed it, he offered the world a way out of madness. But he doesn’t see it . . . and neither does the world.”
His way is still the way!
It is the only way to defeat the occupation of the Zionist-occupied American government: NON-VIOLENT, NON-COOPERATION.
Unfortunately, may Americans don’t even realize they are being manipulated and controlled by Zionist interests.’
********************
“GANDHI’S VOICE (weak, struggling, as he spoke the words to Mirabehn): . . . There have been tyrants and murderers – and for a time they can seem invincible. But in the end they always fall. Think of it – always . . . When you are in doubt that that is God’s way, the way the world is meant to be . . . think of that.
And slowly the camera begins pulling back, leaving the flowers, the brown, rolling current as though leaving the story of Gandhi, going far out, away from the great river, reaching higher and higher, through streaks of clouds as end titles begin.
And through them, once more we hear, dimly, reminiscently, through the rushing wind:
“At home children are writing ‘essays’ about him!” . . . the croaky voice singing, “God save our gracious King” . . . Dyer: “Sergeant Major –,” the Sergeant Major: “Take aim!,” Dyer: “Fire!,” the sound of massed rifle fire, screams . . . “You are my best friend . . . my highest guru, and my sovereign lord.” “Who the hell is he?,” “I don’t know, sir.” “My name is Gandhi. Mohandas K. Gandhi.” . . . the sound of rioting, women’s screams, terror . . . “Find a child – a child whose mother and father have been killed. A little boy . . . about this high.” . . . “He thinks he’s failed.” . . . “Long live Mahatma Gandhi! . . . Long live Mahatma Gandhi!”
Yes, long live Gandhiji!
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: life-affirmation, politics | Leave a comment »
Why not? He’s working for them.
“Mr. Obama, Bring Down the War Criminals!
by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy
Among several sticky tar babies Bush left Obama the worst are: Guantanamo, torture, capital war crimes! The clock is ticking for Obama. The time for ‘good faith’ is running out! Unless Obama moves to close Guantanamo now and end the practice of torture while bringing war crimes charges against Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney et al., he risks being so charged himself!
Preventive detention is the classic defining characteristic of a military dictatorship. Because dictatorial regimes rely on fear rather than consensus, their priority is self-preservation rather than improving their people’s lives. They worry obsessively over the one thing they can’t control, what Orwell called “thoughtcrime” -contempt for rulers that might someday translate to direct action.Locking up people who haven’t done anything wrong is worse than un-American and a violent attack on the most basic principles of Western jurisprudence. It is contrary to the most essential notion of human decency. That anyone has ever been subjected to “preventive detention” is an outrage.–Ted Rall, Resign Now
One hundred days have come and gone!
*******************
I am sick to death of talk, spin and propaganda! I want action! The world demands action! The world demands an immediate end to this bullshit! Mr. Obama, TEAR DOWN THESE ILLEGAL PRISONS! MR. OBAMA, BRING TORTURERS AND MURDERERS TO TRIAL!MR. OBAMA, STOP THE WAR CRIMES, STOP THE MURDERS, STOP THE TORTURE! NOW! A list of broken promises continues to grow! These crimes are but a continuation of Bush administration policies.
You were elected to RIGHT the many wrongs that had been done by Bush!
You were elected to UPHOLD the rule of law!
You put your hand on a black book and swore to protect and defend the Constitution! That act meant nothing to Bush. We had hoped it meant more to you!
To read the rest of this post, go HERE
Also read: Too Obvious To Mention: Obama-Era Lies Protect Bush-Era Crimes
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: politics, torture, usa | Leave a comment »
“The Obama administration is morphing into the Bush administration…. Obama’s decision to revive the military tribunals completes “a perfect mosaic of hypocrisy“
And you thought you voted for change!
“On first trip to Mideast, Obama has delicate task; Seeks to open dialogue, avoid democracy lecture” by Farah Stockman, Globe Staff | June 3, 2009
WASHINGTON – Behind the scenes, however, Obama has opted to continue signature Bush-era democracy programs and is on track to greatly increase their funding.
Related: PNAC
Yup, they are still running the show, Americans.
And the same MSM that lied you into these wars of conquest for Israel still has the chutzpah to call these mass-murdering aggressions “democracy programs?”
“They want to be less vocal on their democracy efforts,” said Kent Patton, deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs under Bush. “They believe the Bush administration was too vocal, that was coun terproductive. . . . But I do believe that they see the value in these programs and in the broader effort. Right now, they are just shifting the means to achieve the same ends that President Bush was trying to achieve.”
Obama’s 2010 budget proposal seeks $86 million for the Middle East Partnership Initiative, a program developed in 2002 by Elizabeth Cheney, daughter of the former vice president, and that promotes training of government officials, entrepreneurs, and activists, up from $50 million in 2009.
So all that bric-a-brac flak betweeen the two is really a load of crap, isn’rt it?
Obama’s budget also seeks to nearly double, to $1.4 billion, funding for the Millennium Challenge Corporation, a program started in 2004 that uses aid as an incentive for government reform in the developing world. He also wants an increase in US contributions, from $3 million to $14 million, to a United Nations fund aimed at strengthening civil society and democratic governance around the world.
Yeah, we really have money to throw around here in America:
“the deficit for this year will soar to an astronomical $1.84 trillion“
Obama’s budget request tracks closely with Bush’s requests last year, but analysts say the Democratic-controlled Congress is poised to grant more of Obama’s requests….
Just like they funded all the wars, those antiwar Democrats!
So politics is nothing but s*** fooleys for the s***-chomping AmeriKan citizen, ‘eh?
Obama defended his low-key approach in a series of interviews on the eve of his trip, even as he said he wanted to promote human rights as a universal value and American values of “democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of religion.”
This kind of talk is just offensive coming from a nation and its leaders that have launched mass-murdering wars of aggression on lies and runs black-site torture chambers all over the globe.
“We’re not going to get countries to embrace our values simply by lecturing or through military means,” Obama said on National Public Radio on Monday. “The danger I think is when the United States or any country thinks that we can simply impose these values on another country with a different history and a different culture,” he told the BBC.
Just hot fart mist, that’s all it is.
Many presidents have had to walk the line between supporting allies that are powerful, autocratic regimes, or advocating for their oppressed people.
Yeah, leave the U.S. hypocrisy for an uninvestigated, uncontextualized sentence.
For decades, the US government has given military protection and economic aid to autocratic governments, believing that the stability they bring is in US interests, particularly in the turmoil-prone Middle East.
And NO PROBLEM, ‘eh, AmeriKan jewsmedia?
But after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the Bush administration saw democracy as the best antidote to Islamic radicalism.
When they PEDDLE SUCH OBFUSCATING RUBBISH, who can blame me for getting angry?
In 2005, Bush delivered a message that year at the National Endowment for Democracy, declaring that “Islamic radicalism” will be defeated by freedom, because “free peoples will own the future.”
Bush’s message, coupled with his new programs, met with some initial success, as Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak held the country’s first multiparty elections and other countries allowed unprecedented political participation.
But Bush’s democracy push – never popular with Middle Eastern governments – eventually alienated ordinary people, as he used it to justify the war in Iraq, and lost steam during his final years in office as Islamists began winning elections.
After the Muslim Brotherhood won seats in the Egyptian Parliament, the White House stopped pressuring Egypt to reform. When the anti-Israeli militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah won elections in Gaza and the West Bank, and Lebanon, respectively, the Bush administration actively undermined them.
Well, HOW DID THEY DO THAT, MSM? Yeah, just leave it there!
I can’t tell you how unhappy I am about the AmeriKan jewsmedia and their garbage. I think I’m going to stop reading them altogether now.
By the time Bush left office, many Arabs saw US democracy promotion as a code word for imperialism. The approval rating for US leaders last year was just 6 percent in Egypt and 12 percent in Saudi Arabia, according to a Gallup poll released yesterday. Under Obama, US leaders already have higher ratings, with 25 percent and 29 percent, respectively, the poll said….
I no longer believe MSM polls — or anything else they claim. Too many lies for too long.
J. Scott Carpenter, a fellow at the conservative-leaning Washington Institute who headed the Middle East democracy promotion effort under Bush, said: “…. Obama doesn’t talk about human rights. He doesn’t talk about democracy, as if those are Bush words. But they are not. They are American words.”
Placed in their mouths by Zionist Jews.
—more–”
“Obama to restart military tribunals, with more rights” by Lara Jakes, Associated Press | May 15, 2009
WASHINGTON – President Obama will restart Bush-era military tribunals, reviving a fiercely disputed trial system he once denounced.
Obama’s decision to resume the tribunals is certain to face criticism from liberal groups, already stung by his decision Wednesday to block the court-ordered release of photos showing US troops abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan – a reversal of his earlier stand on making the photos public.
Yeah, we are getting used to the broken promises.
It’s also possible that some could continue to be held indefinitely as prisoners of war with full Geneva Conventions protections, according to another senior official.
—more–”
“Obama keeps tribunals, draws ire; Reversal angers some backers” by Joseph Williams, Globe Staff | May 16, 2009
WASHINGTON – President Obama’s decision to overhaul and restart the Bush administration’s military tribunals for Guantanamo Bay terrorism detainees won support from congressional Republicans yesterday, but deepened his estrangement from the liberal activists who helped sweep him into office.
He could care less about you.
In a statement yesterday, Obama said he was reviving the tribunals for a small number of the 241 Guantanamo inmates because the commissions “are appropriate for trying enemies who violate the laws of war, provided that they are properly structured and administered.”
The White House asserted that Obama was not embracing the Bush system because he was adding significant legal protections for detainees, such as not allowing statements obtained through waterboarding and other extreme interrogation tactics. Like Bush, Obama is trying to walk a fine line between adhering to the rule of law and ensuring that dangerous, avowed enemies of the United States remain behind bars.
“This is the best way to protect our country, while upholding our deeply held values,” said Obama, a former constitutional law professor.
As he violates the hell out of ’em!
But civil liberties groups, among his staunchest allies on the political left, vowed to fight the move and lashed out at the president, accusing him of turning his back on his own ideals and reneging on another campaign promise. They also questioned whether, after just four months in office, Obama is caving in to Republicans who have openly challenged him on the issue of national security.
“It’s disturbing,” said Tom Andrews of Win Without War, a coalition of groups opposed to the US troop presence in Iraq. “It’s not just one episode, it’s a clear trend that’s emerging.”
Andrews said he and other liberal activists are dismayed and angered by Obama’s reluctance to investigate what they consider the use of torture during interrogations of detainees, his decision to retain the power to place terrorist suspects in secret overseas prisons, and his reversal earlier this week in which he announced he would fight the release of a new batch of photos showing US personnel abusing detainees in Afghanistan and Iraq.
“Now, he’s going to revive a [tribunal] system that has no credibility at all in the world,” said Andrews, a former member of Congress….
Whatever, liberals; I’m still waiting for you guys to smell the 9/11 Truth.
The rest of the 241 Guantanamo detainees will, potentially, held indefinitely as prisoners of war. A Guantanamo inmate, who helped establish detainees’ rights to challenge their detention in a case that went to the US Supreme Court, was freed and arrived yesterday in France, which agreed to take him in a gesture to the Obama administration, the Associated Press reported. Lakhdar Boumediene, suspected in a bomb plot against the US embassy in Sarajevo, was arrested along with five other Algerians in 2001 in Bosnia, but was later cleared of any terrorist activity and is expected to live with family.
That’s because TERRORISM is GOVERNMENT-CREATED, -FUNDED, and DIRECTED!
Though it was a major policy decision, Obama did not announce it in person. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the president will give a speech about the tribunals and other related issues on Thursday.
Gibbs told reporters yesterday that the tribunals will ensure “certain justice” for the detainees as well as “live up to our values.” Asked about alienating the administration’s core supporters, he said that national security was “first and foremost” on Obama’s mind.
As civil liberties groups blasted Obama for the decision to build on what they called Bush’s flawed, hastily constructed system, Republicans praised him for recognizing reality, saying that becoming commander in chief has forced Obama to set aside campaign positions….
One top Democrat, Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also supported Obama. “I objected to the military commissions that were created by the Bush-Cheney administration because they stripped away critical protections in our laws,” Leahy said in a statement yesterday. “People in American custody must be treated fairly, humanely and in accordance with our laws. I look forward to reviewing the Obama administration’s proposals for providing a fair system of military commissions.”
The tribunal system was designed to deal with enemy combatants captured by the US military on the battlefields of Afghanistan starting in late 2001. But human rights and legal organizations repeatedly challenged the system because it denied defendants most of the basic rights they would have been granted in a civilian courtroom or a traditional military court martial.
Civil libertarians have argued that the detainees’ cases belong in US federal court, where the government has won dozens of cases against suspected terrorists – including Zacharias Moussaoui, the so-called “20th hijacker,” now serving a life sentence in prison.
Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University, said yesterday that Obama’s decision to revive the military tribunals completes “a perfect mosaic of hypocrisy” that began with his decision to accept the Bush administration’s position on a lawsuit filed by five men who claim they were kidnapped and tortured by the CIA. Obama’s lawyers are seeking to dismiss the suit, arguing that it would reveal government secrets and threaten national security.
“The Obama administration is morphing into the Bush administration on these important issues,” Turley said.
Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said his agency intends to fight the decision in court, which could take years. “Ultimately, this is very likely to be found to be another illegal scheme,” he said.
Andrews said he believes Obama’s decision is an overreaction to Republican criticism that Democrats’ antiterror policies would bring Guantanamo detainees to US prisons, and to former vice president Dick Cheney, who has taken to the airwaves to argue that Obama has made the nation less safe. “It’s about whether terrorists are going to show up in your neighborhood, and see a terrorist mowing the lawn next door. It’s outrageous,” Andrews said of Cheney.
What, Bush out mowing his yard again?
Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political analyst, said that politically, Obama seems to have taken a calculated risk: make national-security decisions that will mollify Republicans, even if it means taking intense heat from liberal Democrats in the short term.
“His gamble is that the left will stay with him. I think that gamble will pay off,” Sabato said.
Sadly, so do I.
—more–”
And seeing as Obama is moving the same aganda forward as Bush, this stinks of fooleys, doesn’t it?
“Obama and Cheney clash on fight against terror” by Joseph Williams and Bryan Bender, Globe Staff | May 22, 2009
WASHINGTON – Meanwhile, Obama also drew fire from some civil liberties groups by suggesting yesterday that he would continue to hold some terrorism suspects indefinitely….
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the top Democrat, praised Obama for “being honest with the American people” while avoiding fear-mongering, while her Republican counterpart, John Boehner, said that the president dismissed the concerns of the American people and a strong bipartisan majority that does not want Guantanamo detainees brought to their communities.
On the Senate side, Senator Patrick Leahy – a Vermont Democrat who has proposed a truth commission to get to the bottom of controversial Bush administration decisions on handling terrorists – agreed with Obama, saying, “It’s time to act on our principles and our constitutional system.”
This type of talk is disgusting when you consider that EVERYTHING THEY ARE APPROVING is CONTRADICTORY to OUR VALUES!! OUR VALUES, not GOVERNMENT’S VALUES!!!!
But Senator John Cornyn, an influential Texas Republican, asked:
“Are we really going to insist that the jihadist with a suitcase nuke captured in Times Square be read his Miranda rights, potentially closing off the chance to garner valuable intelligence that might save hundreds or thousands of American lives?” he asked.
Oh, ANOTHER FALSE FLAG in the works, ‘eh?
Is it going to be something like this, to be blamed on them?
Civil libertarians, who have sued the government on behalf of detainees held for years without charges or trial, embraced Obama’s dedication to constitutional principles but were dismayed by his plans to create a version of indefinite detention for some terrorist suspects.
“The president wrapped himself in the Constitution and then proceeded to violate it,” said Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a human rights group….
—more–”
Of course, IT ALL STINKS like S*** because 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB performed primarily by the CIA, MOSSAD and America’s DUAL NATIONAL ZIONIST TRAITORS in GOVERNMENT!!
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: politics, torture, usa | Leave a comment »
Such a proud title for the most liberal state in the nation. What a bunch of frauds.
When you consider that “terrorism” is GOVERNMENT CREATED, FUNDED, and DIRECTED, readers, you realize that THESE GUNS are to be USED AGAINST YOU, American citizens!!!!
What evil (destruction of the economy, starvation) do the elite rulers have planned for you that the cops would need to be packing such weaponry?
“Police getting more firepower; 200 to be armed with assault rifles” by Donovan Slack and Maria Cramer, Globe Staff | May 29, 2009
Yeah, THEY CAN HAVE ‘EM; you can’t!
The Boston Police Department is preparing a plan to arm as many as 200 patrol officers with semiautomatic assault rifles, a significant boost in firepower that department leaders believe is necessary to counter terrorist threats, according to law enforcement officials briefed on the plan.
PATROL OFFICERS? Because of that DAMN LIE?
The initiative calls for equipping specialized units, such as the bomb squad and harbor patrol, with the high-powered long-range M16 rifles first, the officials said. The department would then distribute the weapons to patrol officers in neighborhood precincts over the next several months, according to the two law enforcement officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not have permission to speak publicly.
The officials did not know exactly when the department planned to start handing out the rifles but said police officials already have acquired the guns….
The M16 rifle is a standard, military-issue weapon distributed to US armed forces. It can be used in the field by soldiers with a fully automatic function, operating as a machine-gun, but the Boston proposal is to arm them the weapons for semiautomatic operation.
Which — if the gun-control propaganda is correct — can easily be made an automatic weapon.
The law enforcement officials who discussed the proposal said department leaders have described the need for more potent weaponry to confront terrorists like the ones who attacked hotels and other sites in Mumbai, India, last November, killing 166 people and wounding 234 others.
It’s time to wake up, Bahstonians!!!
But the plan has sparked a debate within the Police Department about the safety of routinely deploying military-grade weapons on Boston’s streets. Currently, the department keeps its stock of high-powered rifles locked in special gun cars that can be driven to crime scenes when they are needed by SWAT teams.
Some police union officials, who are scheduled to discuss the firepower upgrade with department management today, are concerned that the weapons are too powerful for city streets and that they could fall into the wrong hands and be used against police officers and citizens, the officials said. But other union leaders are not as concerned.
So the tyranny-supporting Globe isn’t worried about gun control here, ‘eh?
Yeah, I have had it with the Globe, I really have.
And I used to think they were one of the best newspapers around.
Detective Miller Thomas, president of the Boston Police Detectives Benevolent Society said the plan is to equip patrol officers, detectives, and supervisors with the rifles.
Why do all of them need one? Supervisors and detectives, too?
Boston would not be the first city to arm patrol officers with assault rifles. Many other large police departments – including those in Chicago, Miami, Las Vegas, Cincinnati, and Phoenix – are using such rifles already or are planning to.
The slow encroachment of tyranny, Amurka!
In Denver, patrol officers have been armed with assault rifles for at least a decade, Denver police spokesman Sonny Jackson said. The rifles are widely distributed, Jackson said, but he declined to say how widely distributed, citing safety reasons. Officers keep them inside hard cases secured in the trunks of police cruisers, in accordance with department policy, which also dictates that the chamber be empty and no magazine loaded in the weapon, he said.
That’s not the same as a PATROLMAN WALKING the BEAT with ONE — or a detective called to investigate a crime!
Jackson said the department began using the rifles when Denver police officials saw that officers in other cities were being outgunned by suspects packing high-powered weapons.
“What we were seeing is that the suspects, they’re using heavy artillery, they’re using assault rifles,” Jackson said. “And the officers were only using handguns, and they were at a deficit.”
Then DECRIMINALIZE DRUGS, assholes!!!!!!!!!!!!
In Boston, the law enforcement officials said the idea of arming patrol officers with assault rifles was first floated about a year ago by Deputy Superintendent Darrin Greeley. But the plan did not gain support from his superiors until after the Mumbai attacks.
And THERE YOU GO, Bostonians!! Can it BE ANY CLEARER?!!
The department already has received 200 fully automatic rifles from the federal government and plans to modify them to perform like semiautomatic weapons, shooting only one bullet at a time instead of rapidly spraying bullets at targets, the law enforcement officials said.
Thomas said the need for such weapons is clear. He pointed to recent fatal attacks on officers, including the April 4 fatal shooting of three Pittsburgh police officers who were killed by a man lying in wait and armed with an assault rifle.
Oh, ANOTHER SUSPICIOUS SHOOTING here in AmeriKa that JUSTIFIES MORE TYRANNY!
“If you look around, policemen get pinned down by someone who is firing on them, by virtue that they are being fired at from a greater distance,” Thomas said.
Right now, he said, most Boston officers are equipped only with 40-caliber pistols that shoot targets at a maximum of 25 yards away.
“Certainly having our guys with the proper equipment on the street is a benefit to everybody,” Thomas said.
Yup, it is ALL FOR YOUR OWN GOOD!!
—more–”
They need M-16s for this, huh?
“Police were still investigating the crash yesterday afternoon and had not determined whether any of the drivers will be cited”
Yeah, the Boston cops got time to cruise the strip, bust brothels, hang out in bars, buy drugs, and worry about cellphones while ROBBERIES, RAPES, and MURDERS go UNSOLVED!!!
Related: Who Remembers Timothy Finch?
“Earlier this month, police wrapped up a 30-day sting involving plainclothes officers mimicking tourists and other pedestrians. Once they were panhandled, they essentially became victims guaranteed to show up for a trial”
And now they need bigger guns for the ‘terrorists!”
Update:
“Mayor says no to police rifle patrols; Backs M-16s only for special units Some local leaders irate over plan” by Michael Levenson and Donovan Slack, Globe Staff | May 30, 2009
Facing sharp criticism, Mayor Thomas M. Menino said yesterday that he will not approve a Boston Police Department plan to arm neighborhood officers with semiautomatic rifles, although he expressed some support for their use by specialized units.
The police have obtained 200 M-16s free of charge from the US military and made plans to train dozens of officers and arm them with the rifles…. While special units and patrol officers in other cities such as Chicago, Miami, and Denver use semiautomatic weapons, Boston’s plans ignited a backlash.
Community leaders decried the lack of public notice and questioned the reasoning behind arming district officers with M-16s when the city’s SWAT team – which responds to standoffs, hostage situations, and other major situations with the potential for violence – already has such weapons….
“It seems like people wanted to get their free toys, and now they have to make up rhyme and reason for what to do with them,” said Jorge Martinez, executive director of Project RIGHT, which runs violence prevention programs in Roxbury. “They come up with these ridiculous ideas. What’s wrong with this commissioner? This guy is supposed to be a national leader in community policing.”
Davis cited the shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado in 1999, where first-responders waited for specialized teams to arrive even as two teen shooters killed their schoolmates inside.
Yup, foist the the COLUMBINE LIE upon us, agenda-pushers!!!!!
Police administrators had been citing the terrorist attacks last year in Mumbai, India, as justification for the new guns….
Yup, IF ONE LIE doesn’t work, use another!
Department administrators told union leaders they planned to provide up to 40 hours of training to officers selected to carry the weapons, including having each fire some 2,000 practice rounds, according to the law enforcement officials quoted yesterday by the Globe. Other officers would take a less-intensive class on the weapons so they would know how to handle one in an emergency.
And HOW MUCH is that going to COST YOU, taxpayers, and HOW COME the Globe DOESN’T SEEM TO CARE?!! They CARE when it is some cop allegedly padding his pocket.
The point I’m making, people — and I know from reading the Globe — is that the Globe is SELECTIVE about where it decides to focus its lens of outrage and probity.
The plans seemed to contradict the recommendations of a police review panel, which suggested in 2005 that the department intensively train all officers who could be required to use a special weapon such as a pepper-pellet gun in an emergency.
The panel formed in 2004 after officers fatally shot Emerson College student Victoria Snelgrove and wounded two other Red Sox fans with pepper-pellet guns during a pennant celebration outside Fenway Park.
—more–“
Gee, seems like a PATTERN with the Boston cops:
And so does the pro-police state, big-city War Daily.
My dejection and sadness just grows every day regarding AmneriKa’s MSM.
And if it is doing that to me, imagine what it is doing to the parents of the fine young man! What if he were YOUR BOY?
“I miss him,” she said, clutching a wet tissue.
Cathy and Jeffrey Woodman visited the site yesterday where their son, David, was arrested and lay unconscious before his death last June.
“Police held blameless in man’s death; Student celebrating win had a heart condition” by Shelley Murphy and Stephanie Ebbert, Globe Staff | January 30, 2009
Boston police officers did not use excessive force and were not to blame for the death of David Woodman, a 22-year-old Emmanuel College student who stopped breathing after police arrested him during the Celtics championship celebration last June and died later, prosecutors said.
On the seven-month anniversary of Woodman’s death, Daniel F. Conley, the Suffolk district attorney, announced yesterday that Woodman, after being arrested for public drinking, suffered an arrhythmia as a result of a preexisting heart condition.
His parents, Jeffrey and Cathy Woodman of Southwick, reacted angrily after a meeting with Conley yesterday, saying they cannot believe that police are blameless in their son’s death. They said their son, who had heart surgery as an infant, led an active lifestyle and never suffered an arrhythmia before.
“I think it’s a little unrealistic to ask us to believe that the police did everything right,” said Cathy Woodman, a secretary, wiping away tears as she sat beside her husband during a press conference at their lawyers’ office in Boston.
She said that the family had to wait months for the results of Conley’s investigation and still does not have copies of the medical examiner’s report or other documents that support his findings.
“We just wanted information,” she said. “Now we have it, and it just sounds like a lie.”
Government investigating itself!? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it’s a duck, isn’t it?
(Please read this post to the very end for what REALLY HAPPENED)
Conley said that after reviewing the medical examiner’s report, findings of a cardiac specialist, and interviewing police and other witnesses, he concluded that Woodman’s heart condition caused his death.
“No police officer caused Mr. Woodman’s death, and no police officer used excessive force in arresting Mr. Woodman,” Conley said during a press conference at his Boston office. He said no criminal charges were warranted against the nine officers present during Woodman’s arrest. Conley said he will immediately release the entire investigative file to the Woodmans.
It’s called a COVER-UP, Globe! And what a pot-smoking scum Conley is!!
Also see: Mass. DA’s Broke the Law
After watching the Celtics’ championship victory at a bar, Woodman, who lived in Brookline, was walking home June 18 with four friends and carrying a cup of beer when they passed the officers at Fenway and Brookline Avenue. One of Woodman’s friends, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Woodman said, “Wow, it seems like there’s a lot of crime on this corner.”
The friend said officers slammed Woodman to the ground and then ordered his friends to leave the area or face arrest. But Conley concluded that Woodman would not stop for police and resisted arrest by grabbing a wrought-iron fence, requiring several officers to bring him to the ground. He was charged with public drinking and resisting arrest.
“They used a level and type of force appropriate to the resistance they encountered, and they complied with the Boston Police Department’s rules and procedures in doing so,” Conley said.
After Woodman was handcuffed behind his back, Conley said, the officers tried to get Woodman to his feet, but he could not stand. Believing he was drunk and unaware of his medical condition, police returned him to the ground, positioning him on his side, in case he vomited, Conley said.
“Within one or two minutes, they noticed that he was not breathing and had no pulse, and they immediately took action,” Conley said. One officer began mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, another performed chest compressions, a third called for an ambulance, and three more ran for an ambulance, Conley said.
The Woodmans accused police of using excessive force and neglecting their son, pointing out that by the time he arrived at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, he had significant brain damage from a lack of oxygen. He regained consciousness, but days later, on June 29, he suffered another arrhythmia and died.
Conley said that Dr. James R. Stone, chief of cardiovascular pathology service at Massachusetts General Hospital and a consultant to the medical examiner in the case, found that both arrhythmias resulted from Woodman’s heart abnormalities and that the second arrhythmia would have killed him, even if the first had never occurred.
Commissioner Edward F. Davis, who was at Conley’s press conference, said later that he believed police acted appropriately. However, police policies might change as a result of the episode, he said.
WHY CHANGE if “police acted appropriately?” GUILTY!!!!!
For instance, he said, the nine officers who were present at Woodman’s arrest immediately went to the hospital for stress treatment, leaving a superior who did not witness the event to write the report.
Yeah, MURDERING SOMEONE will STRESS YOU OUT!!!!
Thomas Drechsler, a Boston lawyer who represents eight of the officers, said it was a very stressful situation for the officers who arrested Woodman and then tried to revive him. “They felt awful about it,” Drechsler said. “They did their best.”
That’s OFFENSIVE!!
If they felt so awful, they SHOULD NOT HAVE ROUGHED UP the KIDS!
The Woodmans’ lawyer, Howard Friedman, said the family will review the investigative file and consult an independent medical specialist before deciding whether to file a lawsuit against the Police Department. Former US Attorney Donald K. Stern, tapped by Davis to conduct an independent review, said he will focus on police practices the night of the arrest.
The FBI and US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan will review the case to determine whether a civil rights investigation by the Justice Department is warranted.
So that’s the toughest charge these murderers MAY face? CIVIL CHARGES? And they will GET OFF THOSE, too, right?
Cathy Woodman said she and her husband, an elevator mechanic, will keep fighting for their son “because it’s not right that there were nine officers and one David, and all of his friends were shooed away.”
I grieve for this family. What should have been a happy occasion for all was destroyed by tyranny that is based on lies — and the world lost a beautiful young man who could have done great things. Now we will never know.
—more–”
Why the SANITIZED REPORT, Globe?
Being a PRO-POLICE STATE, PRO-AUTHORITY, agenda-pushing piece of garbage wouldn’t have anything to do with it, right?
Let’s GO BACK IN TIME, readers, to see what REALLY HAPPENED THAT NIGHT!
I find it sad that this needs to be reported by a Globe columnist, and wasn’t ever referred to in any of the “news” reports (type David Woodman in to my blog search and scroll down).
“We watched the police unload from buses. They were in riot gear, with batons and shields. There were hundreds and hundreds of them, and I looked around and said, ‘Is this really necessary?’…. People were high-fiving each other. They weren’t fighting. It was not a hostile crowd. But the police kept pouring off the buses, and they were very aggressive and very hostile, and I was thinking, ‘Do they really need this many cops?’ And I was thinking, is this going to make things better or worse?”
It made things worse for David Woodman. He mouthed off walking past a group of cops, with a beer in his hand. Woodman said what Jim Rufo was thinking: that it seemed like there were an awful lot of cops around.… experiencing something that felt like a police state.“
Even this brave reporter is biased; yes, the INNOCENT YOUNG MAN “mouthed off.”
Did he deserve to be KILLED for that?
“Asking for trouble” by Kevin Cullen, Globe Columnist | July 21, 2008
Jim Rufo is 44 years old, grew up in Holyoke and now lives near Albany. He and his wife, Tracy, have season tickets for the Celtics and they were there all year for the great, long ride, and were there the night that KG and the boys sent Kobe and the rest of the Lakers packing.
It was a terrific night and the Rufos stepped out onto Causeway Street feeling as good as they had ever felt. Within minutes, things turned uncomfortable.
Not with the crowd. But with the police.
“It looked as though they were ready for the south LA riots after the Rodney King verdict. We watched the police unload from buses. They were in riot gear, with batons and shields,” Jim Rufo was saying the other day. “There were hundreds and hundreds of them, and I looked around and said, ‘Is this really necessary?’
“I’m not going to tell you there weren’t a thousand people who had too much to drink or were on their way to having too much to drink, but they were mostly happy. People were high-fiving each other. They weren’t fighting. It was not a hostile crowd.
“But the police kept pouring off the buses, and they were very aggressive and very hostile, and I was thinking, ‘Do they really need this many cops?’ And I was thinking, is this going to make things better or worse?”
It made things worse for David Woodman. He mouthed off walking past a group of cops, with a beer in his hand. Woodman said what Jim Rufo was thinking: that it seemed like there were an awful lot of cops around.
For this, Woodman was grabbed by some cops and put on the ground and later he was dead. Now, you can dress this up any way you want: that Woodman had a preexisting heart condition, that it was an unfortunate accident, that it was any number of things. But the bottom line is David Woodman is dead and he died as a result of being taken into custody by some cops who didn’t like some kid mouthing off to them.
You will never convince Jim Rufo that David Woodman is dead for any other reason than that the show of force put on by police the night the Celtics won their 17th championship was something of a self-fulfilling prophecy: that if you hype police officers up for battle, if you send them into a crowd of civilians with weapons, you are asking for trouble.
This is not peculiar to Boston. I’ve seen it happen in Belfast and in Brussels and in Belgrade.
If you give people with authority the green light to kick butt, some of them will overdo it.
But this has everything to do with Boston. After the Patriots won the Super Bowl in 2004, a 21-year-old named James Grabowski got killed, run over by another kid whose response to a football game was to go out and act stupid. That death, and the flaccid police preparation for and response to the riot that precipitated it, sullied the police department.
Months later, after the Red Sox vanquished the Yankees, another 21-year-old, a beautiful girl named Victoria Snelgrove, was killed, this time by police who were determined not let the anarchy that led to Grabowski’s death happen again.
And now another kid, 22-year-old David Woodman, is dead, again at the hands of police officers, who may or may not be held responsible.
How many others have to die before the Boston police figure out that maybe, just maybe, they are helping to create the very conditions they seek to control with storm trooper tactics?
“I have nothing against the police. My grandfather was a policeman,” Jim Rufo was saying. “We understand the police are in a tough position. But somebody died.
“On the way home, Tracy and I talked about walking out and feeling so good, and then experiencing something that felt like a police state. It was unnerving.
“I don’t know what the answer is. But unless you have a riot, you shouldn’t act like there’s a riot.”
Hey, this is the AmeriKan police state in action, so unless you want a club to the nose, you will shut up, Mr. Reporter!!!
Also see: What the Local Police State Looks Like
Of course, I guess Boston cops have BETTER THINGS TO DO, huh?
Turns out it is more than just Bahstahn:
“Police add assault rifles across the state; Officials point to terror concerns” by Donovan Slack, Globe Staff | June 3, 2009
The odds that a local police officer in Massachusetts has access to a military-grade assault rifle, whether in the trunk of a cruiser or at a police station, are far stronger than authorities have previously revealed.
Some 82 cities and towns across the Commonwealth have introduced a total of 1,057 such rifles to their arsenals over the last decade, state public safety officials confirmed yesterday, many of them acquired in recent years in response to the fear of terrorist attacks.
Yup, all the tyranny based on those false flag events.
State officials refused to release a list of which cities and towns have deployed what weapons, citing security concerns. The latest police force to obtain the increased firepower appears to be the MBTA, which just spent $13,000 on a set of semi-automatic assault rifles – 10 Bushmaster, long-range M4s. The T is developing plans to distribute them to transit patrol officers for use in violent emergencies such as terrorist assaults or shooting rampages by individual civilians, transit officials said….
This as the T is deep in debt and corruption. Amazing where they can find money and what they spend it on sometimes.
So now the T TRANSIT COPS are going to packing!!
Stay off the damn subway!
The T’s adoption of the guns is emblematic of a wider proliferation of the weapons in local law enforcement, both in Massachusetts and around the country. The guns are much more powerful and can fire more bullets than typical side arms carried by police officers….
All to control the mobs when the planned destruction of the U.S. economy is completed and WWIII begun.
Community leaders, surprised by the number of military weapons in use statewide, said they were upset by the lack of public discussion of what they called the apparent “militarization” of local police….
You guys are surprised the government is hiding and concealing things from you? Wake up! The government is NOT THERE for YOU, AmeriKa!
It SERVES SPECIAL INTERESTS and WE ALL KNOW WHOM THEY ARE!!!!
Most of the weapons, including Boston’s, were acquired free of charge as part of a US Military surplus program. When the military phases out certain weapons in favor of other, or newer, equipment, the leftovers are made available to local police agencies across the United States, according to the agency that oversees the program, the US Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service.
Oh, isn’t that nice? Cops getting military hand-me-downs.
Nice to know we make more weapons than we need when we outspend the REST of the WORLD when it comes to “defense.”
Meanwhile, you are getting screwed at just about every turn, America. Your taxes are going up all over the place, and you are getting nothing in return.
Arms can also be declared surplus when the overall size of military forces decreases, thereby shrinking the number of weapons needed….
Well OUR ARMED FORCES are INCREASING, so I don’t even know why that statement made the report. Just fits with all the other COULD BES, IFS, MAYBES, HOWEVERS, BUTS, STILLS, and all the other garbage qualifiers found throughout the AmeriKan MSM.
Doug Louison, lawyer for the MBTA Patrolman’s Association: “…. Issuing sophisticated weapons without concern for how they’re being utilized is frightening.”
I thought so.
—more–“
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: american tyranny | Leave a comment »
This is a front-page story, ‘eh?
“Learning to let go with a ho-ho-ho; Some find healing on the laugh track” by Taryn Plumb, Globe Correspondent | June 3, 2009
Laughter, it seems, is endangered – stifled by responsibility, economic frets, and the simple burdens of adulthood. It is the job of “laughter clubs” to battle the trend….
Yeah, never mind the lying, lootings, and wars!
“If people would just brush off sadness and encourage laughter, everyone would be more at peace.”
Tell it to the millions we have murdered and the families we have destroyed in Iraq and Afghanistan
—more–“
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: msm | Leave a comment »
“Local Newspapers Owned by Foreign Agents
Because they are.
“I will “approach the main stream media with the conscious awareness that they are lying to you all the time.”
Because they are.
“The media which has printed these lies and presented the horrors of the day according to the angle desired by those who operate it have become their own worst enemy. They are daily providing the evidence that they lie. Truth tellers on the internet are turning over every rock they tried to bury the truth beneath.“
Of course, if they ever told the truth now, the people would not only be appalled at when has been done and the lies that were told doing it; they would understand the MSM’s role in FACILITATING ABSOLUTE, AGENDA-PUSHING PROPAGANDA and OUTRIGHT RACIST RUBBISH!!!!
And seeing as they won’t change….
“…. Bullshit in colorful packaging… sugar and shit spun together in a monstrous confection….
We all realize that the 24 hour, false propaganda, spin system of the main stream media is nearly entirely owned by Zionist interests as is the entertainment industry and that they are a mouthpiece for murder and disinformation to be justified by all possible means. They are becoming increasingly bankrupt in the eyes of the peoples of the world which is evidenced by the collapse of the newspaper industry and associated enterprises. They are going down. The Apocalypse has lifted the skirts of these shameless whores and revealed the agendas beneath….
—MORE–”
…. they deserve what they get.
Goodbye, American newspapers.
“It should be stated that until Americans put down the mainstream media koolaid and decide to go looking for real news items they have no one to blame but themselves for the lies they are being told over and over again“
We are putting them down; the circulation and sales figures show it. And they didn’t help themselves by shutting down my blog. I’ll never buy a newspaper again. I broke that promise even after they broke my heart.
Heck, even THEY KNOW IT!
“In the back of your mind, you have to be prepared that it just might not be there. At the end of the day, you’re just going to have to cut out some expenses and save more.”
The sooner the AmeriKan newspapers die the better for us all. No one needs to hear or see their divisive, endless agenda-pushing lies, their racist supremacism, or their war-promoting Zionist propaganda.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: msm | Leave a comment »
It is vital that you watch this introduction: David Duke Takes NeoCon Wolf Blitzer To School
And BEFORE you snag the ANTI-SEMITE LABEL on me:
a) I LOVE JEWS like B’Tselem, Neturei Karta, and the honorable Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss
and
b) ARABS are SEMITES, too, and I LOVE THEM with ALL MY HEART!!! What PROUD, HONORABLE, PATIENT, and PEACEFUL PEOPLE !!!!
Related: Jewish Supremacism Rules America
You can attack the man for his past; however, you can not attack him over the facts.
“Who Runs the Media? By David Duke
Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the Western World, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and judiciary. One would like to ask; by whom has it been elected and to whom is it responsible?
— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
In the Oscar-winning 1976 movie Network,1 Howard Beale, the “mad prophet of the airwaves,” becomes consumed with the idea of exposing an insidious danger facing America: the takeover of American television by Arabs through their petro-dollars.
The film was based on an Oscar-winning screenplay by Paddy Chayefsky, who depicts a dark plot by Arabs to buy and control the TV networks. Howard Beale, played by Peter Finch, is a deranged news anchorman who speaks his mind about any subject, resulting in skyrocketing ratings. Raving about the inequities and corruption in American life, Beale would cry out: “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore!”
Imagine if Iraqi-American supporters of Saddam Hussein had control of the American media. Suppose they controlled the national television networks and were a majority of the owners, producers, and writers of television entertainment and news. TV is an irresistible power that reaches into every American home — the primary source by which most Americans learn about the world. Consider the dangers of that enormous power dominated by a tightly knit, Iraqi, Muslim minority that supported the Hussein regime.
If the non-television media were still free, they undoubtedly would treat Iraqi media domination as a great danger to America. Every non-Iraqi source of media would proclaim that such control threatens our freedoms. Congress would likely draft legislation to break up the Iraqi stranglehold on television. Patriots would remind Americans that if we were not free to obtain unbiased news, documentaries, and programming, democracy could not work. The power of TV controlled by one point of view would erode the foundation of all our freedoms: the freedom of speech. Pundits would be outraged that non-Americans, people with allegiance to a foreign power, had control over the American mind.
Taking the analogy further, imagine if the rest of the media were also in Iraqi hands. Suppose that the three major news magazines, Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report were run by Iraqis, that the three most influential American newspapers, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post — as well as a majority of the remaining major newspapers and magazines — were controlled by Iraqis. Imagine that Muslim Iraqis dominated the Hollywood movie industry as well as book publishing and even book distribution. Picture the Iraqis as also holding immense wealth in business and banking, as thoroughly entrenched in entertainment and Hollywood, academia, the judiciary, and the government. On top of all this, suppose that supporters of Saddam Hussein had the most powerful lobby in Washington and were responsible for the bulk of the fundraising of both the Democratic and Republican parties. Suppose a dedicated Iraqi was head of the National Security Council at the White House. Would such a situation be dangerous for America?
If Americans awoke one morning and found Arabic names scrawled all over their TV and movie credits, on their magazine and newspaper mastheads and in the pages of their books, millions would say, “We’ve been taken over!” Viewers would suspect the motives of everything they see on television and read in newspapers, magazines, and books. They would be especially wary of information about issues related to Iraqis, Saddam Hussein, Islam, and the Middle East conflict. In very short order, many Americans would cry out in the fashion of Howard Beale: “I am mad as hell, and I am not going to take it anymore!”
When I came to the realization that the original Russian Revolution was not Russian, that it was financed, organized, and led mostly by Jews who were driven by a centuries-old conflict between themselves and the Russian people, I wondered how such an important fact of history had been so effectively covered up. Upon learning fully about the Communist murder of millions of Christians in Russia and Eastern Europe, I asked myself why there were so few movies, dramatic television series or documentaries, novels, books, or magazine articles about it, but endless coverage of the Holocaust.
Then I read a copy of the Thunderbolt newspaper, published by Dr. Edward Fields of Marietta, Georgia.2 Dr. Fields carefully documented Jewish control of America’s three major television networks, NBC, CBS, and ABC. I carefully checked Dr. Fields’ sources, which included biographies published by Jews.
At the time of my first inquiry, Richard Sarnoff was the head of NBC, William Paley was the head of CBS, and Leonard Goldenson ran ABC. I was amazed to learn that all three were Jews, all were active in Zionist organizations, and all had been honored by awards of numerous Jewish, Zionist, and pro-Israeli groups. Then I discovered that the leading newspaper in America, The New York Times, was Jewish-owned and -edited. So was the newspaper that has more influence on the federal government than any other, The Washington Post. Jews also owned the largest circulation daily paper in America, The Wall Street Journal. They even owned my hometown newspaper, the New Orleans Times-Picayune.
I learned that Jews had dominated Hollywood for years. It was interesting to find out that of the “Hollywood Ten,” who took the Fifth Amendment when asked before Congress whether they were Communists, 9 were Jewish. As I looked into magazine and book publishing, again I discovered a striking preponderance of Jews — most of them dedicated to Jewish interests, much like today’s Steven Spielberg, director of Schindler’s List, 3 who is an outspoken supporter of Zionist causes. In fact, the most-watched movie ever made about the Holocaust, viewed as history by millions, was entirely a Jewish production.
Jerry Molen — producer; Gerald R. Molen — producer; Steven Spielberg — director, producer; Kurt Luedtke — screenwriter; Steve Zaillian — screenwriter; Janusz Kaminski — cinematographer; Michael Kahn — editor; Ewa Braun- set decoration/design, production designer; Branko Lustig — producer, production designer; Allan Starski — production designer; Lew Rywin co-producer.
Years later I read Jewish publications that boasted about Jewish domination of American media. I also read An Empire of Their Own 4 by Neal Gabler, a book that details the Jewish takeover of the film industry.
Ben Stein, a Jewish screenwriter (and son of Herbert Stein, an economic advisor to President Richard Nixon), wrote the book The View from Sunset Boulevard. In it he candidly remarks that a great majority of Hollywood’s television writers and executives are Jewish and that they are adamantly opposed to Christian values and the conservatism of traditional, small-town America.5 He wrote an article for E!-online in 1997 entitled: “Do Jews Run the Media” accompanied by a subtitle that read, “You bet they do — And What of it.” 6
In the ’70s Dr. William L. Pierce, chairman of the National Alliance and editor of National Vanguard magazine, along with his staff, researched the question and documented the Jewish dominance in his essay “Who Rules America?”7
What I discovered was that the worst nightmare of Paddy Chayefsky and his Network character, Howard Beale, has been realized. A small but cohesive minority, with a 3,000-year loyalty to their own people and a fanatical dedication to their newly formed nation, dominates America’s media. But it is not the Arabs who have this power; nor is it the Irish, Germans, French, English, Russians, Swedes, Danes, or Italians. It’s not Muslims, Christians, Mormons, or Catholics. Ironically, it is the group made up of the Paddy Chayefskys of the world. Chayefsky — an enthusiastic supporter of Jewish causes and the state of Israel — cleverly attempts to influence viewers against Arabs by fictionally accusing them of attempting the same thing that Jews have already accomplished. The rest of the Network staff included director Sidney Lumet, producer Howard Gottfried, and editor Alan Heim. The same tribe that financed, produced, wrote and distributed the film Network, dominates the American media, and truly the media of the entire Western world.
Jewish media power is so extensive that one can scarcely exaggerate it. It is not simply a question of their power being disproportionate to their percentage of population — their power is breathtaking.
If you live in a major city, the daily newspaper you read will more than likely be Jewish-owned or -edited. So will the national newsmagazine you buy at the news counter. More than likely, the national cable or regular TV network you watch will be Jewish-owned, and if not, Jews will be preponderant in the executive and decision-making departments. The movie you see in the theater or watch on television will very likely have been produced, directed, or written by Jews — and often all three. The publishers of the hardbacks or paperbacks you read, even the record companies that produce the music you buy, will probably be Jewish-owned, and if not, they will very likely have Jews in key executive positions. Bookstores and libraries often select their new book purchases based on reviews by Jewish critics and publications such as The New York Times Book Review, another part of the Jewish-run NY Times.
It is certainly true that many people in media are not Jews. Nor do I allege that every Jew in media is part of some fantastic and intricate conspiracy or that every Jew is ardently Zionist. But the overwhelming domination and thrust of American media is Jewish, and no group is more ethnocentric and more organized for their perceived interests than are Jews. With these facts in mind, can any reasonable person believe that Jews present news and entertainment without a slant for their own purposes in what Gabler calls “An Empire of their Own”?
I grew up reading the New Orleans Times-Picayune, and from third grade on, I would read it every morning with my father. By the time breakfast ended, Father had decorated it with toast crumbs and coffee stains, and I had garnished it with oatmeal and milk. My father would take the news section first, and I would take the sports and the comics pages, and then it would be my turn to get into the headlines while he read the other parts of the paper. Up until the late ’50s, the Times-Picayune was truly a Southern newspaper. It reflected the values, standards, political viewpoints, and heritage of the South. We considered the paper our lifeblood of information about the simple goings-on around town and about the major events in the world at large. It was our paper — and not only because it was printed in our city; it represented something of our thinking, our culture, and our values.
When integration of schools began, the Times-Picayune railed against the federal intrusion into our way of life. Many articles talked about the amicable relationship between Blacks and Whites in New Orleans, about the excellent quality of life for Whites and Blacks, and about how the city included one of the largest Black entrepreneurial classes of any in America. It wrote about how, under White direction, Black educational and living standards had progressed over the last few decades. The editorial writers of the Times-Picayune predicted dourly that forced integration and the stirring up of Blacks by Yankees and liberal agitators would ruin one of the most beautiful and culturally rich and charming cities in the world. Integration, they maintained, would retard the progress of the Black community and threaten White standards.
After the purchase of the Times-Picayune by S.I. Newhouse, the paper gradually began to shift to the left. Integration was eventually depicted as “progress” and something that would increase “love” and “brotherhood.” Editorials chastised those who opposed integration, referring to them as bigoted, hateful, and shortsighted. Integration, the paper claimed, would promote racial goodwill and lessen poverty and crime (which was then manageable). “What is the harm,” the paper moralized, “with two little Negro girls going to a White school?”
As the city’s schools and government services began to disintegrate under integration and the Times-Picayune became increasingly liberal, my father — who was mildly conservative — came to dislike it. I still enjoyed the paper, and as I got older, I found myself agreeing with its racial viewpoints. I didn’t know that the Picayune was no longer a Southern newspaper, and that the owner, a Jewish refugee of Czarist Russia, resided in the New York city area.
When Newhouse died, he left a media colossus worth about $10 billion to his two sons, Samuel and Donald. Among their newspaper holdings were the Times-Picayune; the Syracuse, New York, morning Post-Standard and the afternoon Herald-Journal; the Mobile, Alabama, Morning Register and Afternoon Press; the Huntsville, Alabama, morning News and afternoon Times; the Birmingham, Alabama, morning Post Herald and afternoon News; the Springfield, Massachusetts, morning Union, afternoon News, and Sunday-only Republican.
The Newhouse empire today owns 12 television stations, 87 cable-TV systems, two dozen national magazines, 26 daily newspapers, and the Parade Sunday supplement that has a staggering circulation of more than 22 million.
When Newhouse bought the Times-Picayune, it was reported by Time magazine that he commented, “I just bought New Orleans.” 8 In some ways, his statement is accurate. Newhouse and his employees could say anything they liked about any person or any issue with little fear of contradiction. Newhouse, secure in his monopoly, was free to push whatever social and political agenda he wished.
Even today, more than 25 years after Newhouse’s purchase of the Times-Picayune, many in New Orleans are unaware that a Jewish New York family owns the paper. The editorial page gives a local address and says the publisher is Ashton Phelps, a descendent of the family that once owned the paper.
When I was a teenager, just learning of the Jewish control of media, I noticed that many of the Picayune’s advertisers were Jewish-owned businesses, including Goldrings, Levitts, Mintz, Godchauxs (a French adapted Jewish name), Kirshmans, Rosenberg’s, Rubinstein Bros., Gus Mayer’s, Adler’s, and Maison Blanche. One of the biggest advertisers in New Orleans was Sears & Robuck, and Edith Stern, a New Orleans activist in Jewish and liberal causes, was Sears’ largest stockholder. I soon learned that many of the largest advertising agencies, both local and national, were under Jewish ownership and direction. These agencies could steer advertising to whatever newspaper or media outlet they desired.
Jewish advertising power not only has increased the Jewish monopolization and consolidation of American newspapers, it also greatly affects publications with Gentile management or ownership. All major publications are dependent on Jewish advertising revenue, so their features, reporting, and editorial policies must be carefully attuned to Jewish attitudes and interests. Ultimately, the free press is not free. It runs on money. The old axiom certainly holds true in the media: “He who pays the piper calls the tune.”
At the beginning of this century, most major cities had two or three daily newspapers, and many had even more. There has been an alarming trend toward monopolization of daily newspapers. There are only about 50 cities in America with more than one daily newspaper, and many of those have the same parent company. The Newhouse-owned Times-Picayune and the afternoon States-Item aptly illustrate the trend; they merged into the Times-Picayune early and late editions.
As a result, of the 1,600 daily newspapers in America, only 25 percent are independently owned rather than part of a newspaper chain. And only a tiny number are large enough to have even a skeleton reporting staff based outside their own communities. They are dependent on newsgathering conglomerates such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Newhouse chain for their national and world news.
The Jewish domination of American media is long-standing. Even as far back as the 1920s, Jews had influence far disproportionate to their percentage of the population. And even though media operations frequently change hands and the CEOs, chairmen, administrators, and top editors change, Jewish domination is stronger than ever — and the power brokers continue to increase and consolidate their power.
Three Powerful Newspapers
The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post are positioned at the heart of American business, culture, and government. Their influence reaches out across the nation. They originate news, focus on issues of their liking, elevate public figures they approve of and denigrate those they do not. They tell us what movies to see, what books and magazines to read, what records to buy and what art to admire. They influence how we think on a thousand different subjects — and, in fact, they frequently choose what subjects we think about at all.
The New York Times is read all over America — in academia, business, politics, the arts and literary world. It sets our political, social, entertainment, literary, artistic, and fashion standards. The New York Times Company owns 33 newspapers as well as three book-publishing companies, 12 magazines, seven radio and broadcasting stations, and a cable-TV system. The New York Times News Service serves more than 506 newspapers across America.
Like so many other newspapers, it began under Gentile ownership and ended up Jewish. George Jones and Henry Raymond founded the great paper in 1851. Near the turn of the century, Jewish activist Adolph Ochs bought the paper, and now his great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is CEO and publisher. Executive and managing editors are Max Frankel and Joseph Lelyveld.
Because it is so widely read by Washington’s elected and appointed federal officials and bureaucrats, The Washington Post has a huge impact on our government. It can influence appointments, firings, legislation, and foreign and domestic affairs of all kinds. It can even be instrumental in bringing down a president, as it did Richard Nixon. The bosses of The Washington Post can choose to give publicity to an issue or choose to ignore it, choose to be outraged about an event or bellow in approval. The Post has numerous holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines — most notably, Newsweek.
Like The New York Times, The Washington Post started out in Gentile hands. It was founded in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins and was later run by the McLean family. Due to the McLeans’ conservative policies, Jewish advertising shifted to the other Washington papers, driving the Post into bankruptcy. A Jewish financier, Eugene Meyer, stepped in to buy it for a trifling sum at the bankruptcy auction. As soon as it passed into Jewish hands, advertising from Jewish businesses and advertising agencies returned, and the newspaper returned to profitability.
In an effort at further consolidation of the media in our nation’s capital, the Jews ran an advertising boycott of Colonel Robert McCormick’s Times-Herald, which they detested because of its support for anti-Communist Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Unable to sell retail-advertising space, the newspaper shrunk dramatically and began losing about a million dollars a year and was finally sold to Meyer in 1954 at a bargain price. The Washington Post is now run by Meyer’s daughter, Katherine Meyer Graham, the principal stockholder and chairman of the board. Her son Donald is president and CEO.
The third leading influential newspaper in America, especially in the business realm, is The Wall Street Journal, published — along with Barron’s and 24 other daily newspapers — by Dow Jones & Company. The Wall Street Journal has a circulation of more than two million, making it America’s largest business daily and a tremendous influence on business, banking, trade, and economic issues. The CEO of Dow Jones and chairman and publisher of The Wall Street Journal is Peter R. Kann, a Jew.
The Three Most-Read Newsmagazines
Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report are the three major weekly newsmagazines published in the United States. The largest and most respected of these is Time, which has a circulation of more than four million. The CEO of Time-Warner is Gerald Levin, a Jewish benefactor of many Jewish and Israeli causes.
Newsweek is the second most widely read weekly, with a circulation of more than three million. It is under the control of the Washington Post‘s Katherine Meyer Graham, another avid supporter of numerous Jewish causes.
The third-ranking newsmagazine is U.S. News and World Report, whose owner, publisher, and editor in chief is Mortimer B. Zuckerman, a proud Zionist who also owns the Atlantic Monthly and the New York Daily News.
The Giants of Book Publishing
Book publishing is perhaps the part of American media least controlled by Jews. Yet they still dominate the most important parts of that industry. All one needs is a printer and some cash to publish a book, and tens of thousands of printers do business in America along with hundreds of small book publishers. Yet here too the Jewish influence is powerful, for writing a book, no matter how intelligent and provocative, offers no guarantee of it being published, and being published offers no guarantee of being professionally promoted, distributed, or even reviewed. The half dozen or so of the largest publishers and distributors handle 95 percent of the biggest-selling books in America. And in those areas of book publishing and distribution, Jewish appraisal is inevitable and Jewish approval is crucial.
According to Publisher’s Weekly, the three largest American publishers are Random House (and its subsidiaries, including the Crown Publishing Group), Simon & Schuster, and Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner Books; Little, Brown; and Book of the Month Club). Jews control two out of three and the third (Random House, has many Jews in important positions throughout its division of the conglomerate it has joined).
Gerald Levin is CEO of Time-Warner Communications, which owns Time Warner Trade Group. The other major media, Simon and Schuster, is a subsidiary of Viacom Inc. Viacom’s CEO and chairman is Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). Additionally, it should be noted that the largest publisher of children’s books, with more than 50 percent of the market, is Western Publishing, whose chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, who just replaced another Jew, Richard Bernstein.
The Major Book Publishers and Reviewers
One of the most brilliant books of this century dealing with the weakening of the American majority is The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson.9 This book is rich in research and ideas, and it is written with a command of the English language rarely seen today. But Robertson was unable to find a major publisher because he dared to write about the unmentionable subjects of race and Jewish ethnocentrism. No national or major publications would review his work, and no national distributors would handle it. Many national publications would not permit Robertson to buy advertisements for his book because it contained information unacceptable to the self-ordained Jewish censors. Despite its ban from the mainstream bookstores and not being reviewed by the major media critics, Robertson has sold well over 150,000 copies through the mail and by word of mouth.
Television
When I read the article by Edward Fields documenting the Jewish control of the three major TV networks, I was fascinated. ABC, CBS, and NBC produce the overwhelming majority of entertainment television broadcasts in America, and for most Americans they are the primary sources of news. Leonard Goldenson of ABC, William S. Paley of CBS, and David Sarnoff of NBC ran their respective networks for decades, setting the tone and breadth of the modern Jewish domination of broadcasting. Here is a condensation of Dr. William L. Pierce’s “Who Runs the Media” on the current state of American broadcasting.
Who Runs the Media? by Dr. William L. Pierce
Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted increased competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates of concentrated Jewish power.
The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire owns Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television, its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies.
As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies such as The Crying Game, Priests and Kids.
In addition to TV and movies, the corporation owns Disneyland, Disney World, Epcot Center, Tokyo Disneyland, and Euro Disney.
In August 1995 Eisner acquired Capital Cities/ABC Inc., to create a media empire with annual sales of $16.5 billion. Capital Cities/ABC owns the ABC Television Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Houston. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.
ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, who is a Jew. The corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable companies. ABC Radio Network owns 11 AM and ten FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates.
Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications (Women’s Wear Daily), and the Diversified Publishing Group.
Time Warner Inc., is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald M. Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network.
Warner Music is by far the world’s largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersh is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are both Jews.
Warner Music was an early promoter of “gangsta rap.” Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it helped popularize a new genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites.
In addition to cable and music, TimeWarner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing. Time Warner’s publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People Magazine, Fortune).
Levin will again be the number-one media magnate when the planned deal with Turner Broadcasting System is completed. When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was a panic in media boardrooms across the nation. To block Turner’s bid CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals.
If TBS merges with Time Warner, Levin will become Turner’s boss, and CNN, the only rival to the network news, will come under complete Jewish control.
Viacom Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing.
Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster Video stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.
Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience. Redstone, who actually owns 76 percent of the shares of Viacom ($3 billion), offers Beavis and Butthead as teen role models and is the largest single purveyor of race-mixing propaganda to White teenagers and sub-teens in America and Europe. MTV pumps its racially mixed rock and rap videos into 210 million homes in 71 countries and is the dominant cultural influence on White teenagers around the world.
Nickelodeon has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and also is expanding rapidly into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy that is MTV’s trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV.
With the top three, and by far the largest, media conglomerates in the hands of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part.
What about the other big media companies?
Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television Network and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chernin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew.
Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan J. Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division.
Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,” is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also owns Revlon cosmetics.
The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks may soon be in the same league as the big three.
Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman, Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress.
It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of this century. This is still the case today.
Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above – Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram) – accounted for 74 percent of the total box-office receipts for the year to date (August 1995).
As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news programs are all Jews: Victor S. Neufeld (20/20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight).
Westinghouse Electric Corporation recently purchased CBS. Nevertheless, the man appointed by Laurence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew.
At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro (Dateline).1
The overwhelming Jewish control that Dr. Pierce writes about in television and movies is not a new phenomenon. It is not a short-term aberration in the entertainment and news industry. It has been prevalent for decades. Over time the names may change, but the heritage usually remains the same. If anything, the Jewish power in media continues to consolidate and grow. Jewish publications themselves often boast about their power for their own readers.
Pierce, Dr. William. (1998). National Vanguard Books. P.O. Box 330, Hillsboro, WV. 24946. Edited By Brett Anderson.
———————————————-
“An Empire of Their Own”
Even though it is hard to imagine now, Gentiles originated America’s film industry. Thomas Edison patented many of the early cameras and projection techniques and launched the first major studio. The man who pioneered the modern movie was D. W. Griffith, a brilliant director whose techniques and films are still studied by film classes around the world. His silent classic Birth of a Nation10 held the title of most-watched movie in the world until Gone with the Wind.11
Birth of a Nation is a film version of The Clansman, a novel by Southern writer Thomas Dixon.12 The film depicted the fratricidal conflict of the War Between the States and the oppression of the White people during the “Reconstruction” era. It portrays the Klan as a heroic organization that freed the South from the violence and tyranny of Black and carpetbagger rule and paved the way for reuniting the American nation.
When Birth of a Nation appeared, Jewish organizations actually went into the courts attempting to ban the film in a number of major cities, and they applied financial pressure on theaters to keep it from playing. A special showing of the film in the White House garnered an enthusiastic review by President Woodrow Wilson and initiated an irrepressible groundswell of support. The Jewish forces in the fledgling film industry realized that it was far more effective to control the film industry from the inside than to have to fight rearguard actions to suppress films that they did not want the American people to see.
The attempted Jewish banning of Birth of a Nation was not the first or the last attempt at Jewish censorship in America. Many people are surprised when they learn that Jewish groups actually were able to ban a play by the greatest writer of English literature: William Shakespeare. Performing Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice13 became forbidden in New York City in the early years of the 20th century at the behest of the Jewish community, which claimed that it was anti-Semitic.
In the 1990s, the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) did a running series of all Shakespeare’s plays that included Merchant of Venice. A long editorial introduction attempted to condition the audience into interpreting the play as sympathetic to Shylock, the central Jewish character who demanded the Gentile’s “pound of flesh.” The lines in which Shylock defends himself in court, pleading “If you prick a Jew doth he not bleed,” were emphasized to encourage the viewer to interpret the play as favorable to Jews. Interestingly, the Jews made no such interpretation of the play when they intolerantly argued for making performance of the play illegal. Recently, the Canadian Jewish News reported an attempt by Jews to suppress the play in a Canadian school district.14
As they have gone from outsiders to now thoroughly dominating the Western governmental and media establishment, many Jews have shifted from strong defenders of free speech to some of its most willful suppressers.
The Jewish students who dominated the “free-speech” movement at Berkeley in the mid-’60s sang the praises of free speech for the purpose of inviting to campus the likes of the filthy-mouthed and repugnant Allen Ginsberg and the violent, openly Communist, black revolutionary Angela Davis. Today they attempt to silence anyone who dares to speak before a student audience on the issues raised in this book.
In some cases they have reverted to similar tactics to their campaign against Merchant of Venice. In 1976 a national Black talk show broadcast on PBS, Black Perspectives on the News, invited me to Philadelphia for an appearance. After the taping, but before the show aired, the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish organizations discovered that I mentioned the historically well-documented Jewish role in the Colonial slave trade. Jewish activists Sol Rosen, Harry Bass, and Peter Minchuck sought an injunction in the Common Pleas Court in Philadelphia, asking the judge to censor the program. The Jewish judge, Stanley Greenberg, issued an order demanding that the program not be aired until the tape was delivered to him and “approved.” Luckily, the First Amendment Coalition and attorney David Marion appealed the decision to the State Supreme Court and won. However, the Jewish methods of censorship were by no means exhausted.
Jewish organizations then went nationwide in an attempt to suppress the show in each individual PBS affiliate in each city the program was to be broadcast. In a massive campaign of intimidation, Jews wrote and called local PBS stations, threatening a cutoff of donations and public support if they aired the show. If that did not work, opponents promised, picketing, harassment, and even violence against the stations. By the time they finished their dirty work, the original program aired on only a small percentage of the local PBS stations. Furthermore, the stations that did have the temerity to air the original hour show — immediately followed it with a special program attacking my positions and my character without allowing me to respond.
An example of quiet suppression, from among many I could cite, was my experience with the Tomorrow Show with Tom Snyder in 1974. The Tomorrow Show was a late-night talk show that went into serious topics rather than vapid celebrity banter. I did not fit the stereotypical image of the racist that host Tom Snyder had expected, and during the program he surprised me when, on camera, he referred to me as “intelligent, articulate, and charming.” Snyder laughed heartily at my witticisms and repeatedly stated on air that I would soon be back on the show. His last words on the program were “David Duke will be back here.”
Three days later Snyder’s staff called to set up the follow-up show. They said that I would appear along with a Black civil-rights leader, a Jewish rabbi, a liberal Catholic, and a Protestant clergyman. Flight and hotel reservations were made, and I received a confirmation letter from the show. Only three days before the planned taping of the program, a staff member called and told me that she was sorry, but the program had been forced to cancel my appearance. I asked her why, and she confided in me that the Jewish executives at NBC had sternly informed the program that “David Duke will never again appear on the Tomorrow Show.”
The program went on as scheduled, but my detractors were the only guests. They denigrated me for the entire hour with cheap insults. The rabbi, evidently well versed in Freudian psychology, attributed my racial beliefs to “sexual frustration.” And so it went. The media masters had presented four high priests of egalitarianism and silenced the opposition.
The masters of the media are also adept in the dishonest remaking of classic works. Louis Mayer and David O. Selznick’s film classic Gone with the Wind provides an excellent example of story-manipulation. I read Margaret Mitchell’s novel while still in junior high school. But when I first saw the film version during high school, I noticed important differences. In the novel a Black man assaults the heroine, Scarlett O’Hara, arousing the Ku Klux Klan — which Mitchell portrays heroically — to ride for justice. In the Mayer-Selznick movie version, it is a White man who tries to rape Scarlett and a Black man who rushes to her rescue! There is no heroic ride of the KKK. In fact, the Klan disappears from the story altogether. Later I read how the producers purposefully made the change for political reasons.
Mitchell’s real feelings on the KKK were explicitly written in Gone with the Wind:
But these ignominies and dangers were as nothing compared with the peril of white women… It was the large number of outrages on women and the ever-present fear for the safety of their wives and daughters that drove Southern men to cold and trembling fury and caused the Ku Klux Klan to spring up overnight. And it was against this nocturnal organization that the newspapers of the North cried out most loudly, never realizing the tragic necessity that brought it into being…
Here was the astonishing spectacle of half a nation attempting, at the point of bayonet, to force upon the other half the rule of Negroes, many of them scarcely one generation out of the African jungles…15
A film that angered me was Stanley Kramer’s Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner.16 A beautiful young daughter of wealthy parents, portrayed by Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn, wants to marry a brilliant Black doctor, played by Sidney Poitier. The film makes clear that such a marriage creates some problems but it is the morally right thing to do. Of course, Mr. Kramer produced no films promoting Jewish intermarriage with Gentiles. Many years later Newsweek magazine dubbed Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner an “educational film for White Americans, who seeing their screen heroes surrender their daughter to a black male, would feel less compunction in doing the same.” 17
To catalogue the host of anti-White films produced by the Hollywood establishment would be a monumental task, but I can offer some pertinent examples. David Wolper, an ardent supporter of Israel, produced many anti-White programs, including the television miniseries Roots.18 Marvin Chomsky, John Erman, David Greene, and Gilbert Moses directed the much-touted docudrama. Roots was perhaps the second most promoted and watched miniseries ever aired on television (only the Holocaust 19 miniseries had a larger audience due to its incredible media promotion). Roots found its own roots in Alex Haley’s book of the same title. Roots is a historically misleading book and film that produced widespread Black hatred against Whites and self-hatred and guilt among many Whites.20
Interestingly, Jewish writer Harold Courlander sued Alex Haley for plagiarism. In writing a supposedly historically accurate book dealing with the African roots of American Negroes, Haley had stolen whole sections of Courlander’s fictional novel called The African.21 Haley affirmed his plagiarism in agreeing to an out-of-court settlement with Courlander for $500,000. At the height of Roots’ popularity, most Americans never became aware that Haley based part of Roots on a work of fiction.
Freedom Road was another fantasy palmed off to a trusting public as an accurate portrayal of Southern Reconstruction.23 The All-Movie Guidebook, for instance, lists it as an “historical film.” When it came out in 1979, many public-school history and civic classes assigned it for homework. Muhammed Ali starred in the film as Gideon Jackson, a former slave who enters politics and forms an unlikely Southern coalition of freed Blacks and poor Whites. He is then elected to the U.S. Senate from South Carolina and finally leads his poor White and Black followers in a struggle against their wealthy White oppressors until slain in a shootout with the Ku Klux Klan.
History records that there has never been a Black senator from South Carolina. Only two Black senators served during Reconstruction, both from Mississippi, and both died of natural causes. Freedom Road takes on added perspective when one learns that the producer of this historical fantasy was Zev Braun, and the director was J’an K’adir. “Chosenite” Howard Fast wrote the original fictional novel. Fast also happened to be a longtime member of the American Communist Party, and his autobiography is titled Being Red.24 Teachers, probably unaware of Fast’s ardent Communism, ordered millions of public-school children to watch and do reports on this alleged “docudrama.” Is it any wonder that so many White Americans have such a distorted view of their history and of the race issue? Could one expect less, knowing that they are getting a Communist interpretation of American history?
An ad for a TV movie featuring OJ Simpson as a Black cop fighting White crime – the TV world as compared to the real world.
Not surprisingly, the most slavishly promoted miniseries of all time was also the most important film of all to the Jews: The Holocaust. The film was a thoroughly Jewish production. It was directed by Roots’ director Marvin Chomsky. Gerald Green wrote the screenplay. Morton Gould composed the music. The producers were Robert Berger and Herbert Brodkin. TV Guide remarked that during filming in Europe, the writer’s father died. Rather than return home for his funeral, Green felt he was honoring his rabidly pro-Zionist father by staying in Europe to work on The Holocaust. For a dozen hours, the film, a work of extreme ethnic hatred, portrayed Germans and other Eastern Europeans as either bloodthirsty or spineless, and of course, it portrayed every Jew as a paragon of virtue, love, and kindness. Never had a television production received more advance coverage or more praise than The Holocaust. Jewish-run publications and pundits acted as though it was the most important piece of drama in the history of cinema.
While I was still in college, I attended a so-called Black-exploitation film called Farewell Uncle Tom. I read about the film before its showing in New Orleans, where it played in a mostly Black movie house downtown. Expecting a difficult situation, I drove down from Baton Rouge with two of my bravest and most dedicated LSU friends. In 90 minutes, at a matinee filled with Blacks, my friends and I received an emotional and graphic education on the heinous impact of the Hollywood anti-White movies.
Set in the antebellum South, the film portrayed slave life as an orgy of White mutilation, starvation, murder, and rape of Black men and women. A Black revolt occurs, and the screen erupts with revenge-minded Blacks hacking to death White men, women, and children. With each bloody outrage, the audience howled with approval. “Right on!” some screamed. “Rape the Bitch!. . . Kill ’em!” The Black crowd laughed and cheered during the goriest scenes of mutilation, rape, and murder.
To make sure the film’s point was clear to its patrons, the film’s ending flashed to the present day, showing afro-wearing Black men in leather jackets and sunglasses, sneaking into the bedroom of a White couple. The camera depicts the couple’s horror as the attackers hack them to death with a hatchet. In slow motion, the hatchet falls repeatedly, splattering blood and brains across the room. Even after 20 years, I vividly recall the film and the raw hatred it engendered in the Black audience.
At the sight of the murders, the audience worked itself into frenzy. As soon as the credits appeared, my friends and I, sitting in the rear of the theater, grabbed our coats and left quickly. We were somber as we drove back to LSU because we knew that Farewell Uncle Tom was intended to incite Blacks to murder and rape Whites across America.
In researching the film, I discovered that Cannon Releasing Corporation had released it and that Cannon’s president was Dennis Friedland. His associates included Marvin Friedlander, Thomas Israel, James Rubin, and Arthur Lipper. I found out later from a film review that most of the Jews involved with the White-hating film actually had their names removed from the films credits.
The time I spent in that dark theater touched my emotions so powerfully that I swore to myself and to God that I would make whatever sacrifices I must to someday stop the brutal attacks against our flesh and blood as symbolized in that hateful film. I also resolved to stand up against filmmakers who create a climate of anti-White hatred.
During my hundreds of interviews over the years, whenever I mentioned Jewish media domination, my interrogators first would deny the Jewish preponderance of power. Then, when that defense sank beneath a sea of facts, they acted shocked that anyone could even suggest that Jews might use their media power for their own advantage.
The domination of America’s news and entertainment media is so obvious that some Jewish media have begun to acknowledge it, but they suggest the Jewish domination makes no real impact on content. The cover of the August 1996 issue of Moment magazine was blazoned with the headline, “Jews Run Hollywood, So What?” The article, written by well-known Jewish film critic Michael Medved, includes the following comments: “It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.” Medved reports about how Walt Disney studios hires only “highly paid Jewish moguls” such as Jeffery Katzenberg, Michael Ovitz, and Joe Roth as producers. He goes on to state that:
The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harboured anti-Semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions.25
Interestingly, in spite of the attempts to besmirch the name of Walt Disney as an anti-Semite, his films were the most morally spiritually uplifting and educational in the industry. All this while Michael Eisner’s new Disney and its subsidiaries continue to make anti-Christian and sexually degenerate films such as The Priest26 and The Crying Game.27
Not only do the Jewish producers create a plethora of pro-Israel and pro-Jewish propaganda along with their anti-Christian, anti Gentile hate films and documentaries, they are careful to monitor films made by both Jews and Gentiles. For example, Jewish censors of the fact-based film, Seven Years in Tibet, felt that the main character, an ex-Nazi explorer from Austria, was not repentant enough about his past. They had the filmmaker invent a repentance scene and insert it into the “true story.” 28
Michael Medved writes in his article that “Jewish writers and directors employ unquestionably flattering depictions of Jews for audiences that react with sympathy and affection.” It goes without saying that they depict those who oppose Jewish supremacism as thoroughly evil.
A 1998 made-for-television film documentary aired on the Arts & Entertainment cable network boasted of the preeminent Jewish role in media and the shaping of our society to their purposes. It was made by Elliot Halpern & Simcha Jacobvici Productions, and written and directed by Simcha Jacobvici. The documentary tells how Jews overcame the Gentile filmmakers such as Thomas Edison and D.W. Griffith, and gradually replaced their traditional American themes. Movies such as Griffith’s Birth of a Nation which honored our White heritage, became replaced with paeans to the immigrant and multiracialism. They interview Jewish author Neil Gabler, who frankly tells how they replaced the “real” America.
They created their own America, an America which is not the real America…But ultimately this shadow America becomes so popular and so widely disseminated that its images and its values come to devour the real America. And so the grand irony of all of Hollywood — is that Americans come to define themselves by the shadow of America that was created by the Eastern European Jewish immigrants who weren’t permitted in the precincts of the real America.
The narrator goes on to say that the Hollywood Jews became almost godlike in their power and set up a system to raise their prestige in the eyes of Americans.
Where there were new Gods there must be new idols. So, the studio heads began a movie guild with the lofty title of The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. It was Mayer’s brilliant idea to create the Oscars where the movie moguls’ guild honor themselves by giving each other awards. In this way, they went from being a group of immigrant Jews to award-winning American producers.
Jewish power is such that they can make craven even the greatest of Hollywood icons. During an appearance on the Larry King television show, actor Marlon Brando said that “Hollywood is run by Jews. It is owned by Jews.” Brando contended that Jews are always depicted as humorous, kind, loving, and generous while they slander every other racial group, “but are ever so careful to ensure that there is never any negative image of the Kike.”29
Jewish groups came down hard on Brando, stating in their press releases that they would see to it that he “would never work again.” No one in the Jewish press seemed to notice that the threat simply validated Brando’s observation of their unchallenged media power. Brando was so intimidated that he had to arrange an audience with Wiesenthal himself. Brando cried and got on his knees and kissed Wiesenthal’s hands, begging for forgiveness for his truth-telling. Wiesenthal absolved him for his sin, and Brando has said nothing but positive things about Jews ever since.
There can be no renewal for our people until that kind of intimidating power is broken. No regeneration of our society can occur until our people again have true freedom of speech and press.
Once I discovered the Jewish power over the American media, I resolved never to surrender my freedom of speech in deference to it, no matter what it would cost me. I became determined to oppose the media masters who seek to destroy our way of life and our very life form. I am confident that in time my kinsmen will likewise rise up in defiance rather than kneeling in dishonor — like Marlon Brando — to our would be masters.
—MORE–“
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: msm, usa | Leave a comment »
It is vital that you watch this introduction: David Duke Takes NeoCon Wolf Blitzer To School
And BEFORE you snag the ANTI-SEMITE LABEL on me:
a) I LOVE JEWS like B’Tselem, Neturei Karta, and the honorable Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss
and
b) ARABS are SEMITES, too, and I LOVE THEM with ALL MY HEART!!! What PROUD, HONORABLE, PATIENT, and PEACEFUL PEOPLE !!!!
Related: Jewish Supremacism Rules America
You Want Proof of the Zionist Control of Congress? — Here it is!
Olmert Boasts of Jewish Power — ADL says true, but he shut up about it!
You can attack the man for his past; however, you can not attack him over the truth.
“The “Military, Industrial Complex” is no more; Today it is the Political, Financial and Media — Zionist Complex
The “Military, Industrial Complex” really has no relevance to the real holders of global power today.
America is the most powerful military and economic nation on earth. The powers that control the levers of political power in America possess the greatest power the world has ever seen.
Who really has power over the government today? Is it the fabled “Military, Industrial Complex”?
An effective gauge of direct political power in America is “to discover who provided the pivotal amounts of the billion-dollar recent campaigns for U.S. President. You can look directly at campaign contributions for every candidate from the Federal Election Commission in order to find out who holds the real power in politics.
So, who holds the real power over the American political establishment?
Let’s first look at who does not hold much power over the establishment.
1) It is not the military. There is not any organized military monetary influence or even significant political influence of the military over the politicians. In fact, no one in military positions of authority are allowed to openly get involved in politics. No active sergeant, lieutenant, or General can send out a directive to the men under him to support or oppose a particular candidate (the one exception I know to that was when the Louisiana commanding general of the National Guard, under Jewish influence, sent a letter to all national guardsmen telling them that it was their “patriotic duty” to vote against David Duke and for the Liberal corrupt former Governor, Edwin Edwards. Even that caused a scandal in military circles, as it should have.
2) It is NOT major manufacturing or even the huge oil companies. There was not one oil company and only a couple of legitimate manufacturing or industrial concerns on Obama and McCain’s top twenty contributor list. The list was completely dominated by Zionist international banking firms. If one combines every defense contractor’s contributions the money they give in politics is minuscule compared to Zionist international banks. They don’t even come close to the power in lobbying that AIPAC and a couple of dozen more Jewish extremist organizations have. Jewish lobbyists literally get almost unanimous support in Congress for outrageous giveaways to Israel, a nation that has committed terrorism against us and killed or maimed scores of Americans. I am not talking about contracts here, I am speaking about giving away billions of dollars to a foreign nation.
So, so much for the media-popularized term, the military-industrial complex
In direct political money and lobbying then, Zionists are the undisputed masters of the American political establishment. In addition to their control through the use of money as an inducement or a threat, they have tens of thousands of Jewish extremists scattered throughout the entire bureaucracy who are very conscious of supporting their brethren and supporting the organized Jewish agenda. They also are ready to act against any Gentile who dares to go against Israel or the Jewish agenda.
How will a Jewish federal judge rule in a huge litigation issue between Jewish and non-Jewish parties? Why was the biggest robber in the history of the world, Bernie Madoff who stole over 50 billion dollars and who ruined tens of thousands of families, only charged with one criminal count, and allowed to stay in his luxury apartment to await trial?
Is there an organized Jewish agenda? Absolutely. In fact, the leading and most powerful Jewish groups have a supra-organization called the Council of Presidents (composed of the most powerful 5 dozen Jewish organizations in America). They issue detailed positions not just on Mideast policy but on many other issues that have nothing to do with Israel, aspects of domestic policy including issues such as opening America’s borders. They even assume positions on issues that you wouldn’t even think would have unanimity among Jews, such as abortion rights. Their job is to make sure that Jewish power is absolutely united on what they decide are their common agendas.
Next, we must talk about one of the most influential parts of the American political process, the mass media. The media, such as the NY Times and the Washington Post (the newspaper read by every member of America’s government and bureaucracy in Washington).
The Washington Post can determine even what issues Congress will discuss and it greatly affects the publicity for or against those issues. Broadcast and cable television also have an enormous impact, and we can include movies, books, magazines and the newspaper chains that reach down into almost every American community. As my chapters in Jewish Supremacism on “Jewish Media Supremacy” document, the ownership, depth and breadth of Jewish influence in the media is simply breathtaking.
In media, whether you speak of owners, administrators, managers, editors, producers, writers, correspondents, pundits and reporters, there is an army of Jews who are animated by the Holocaust and the issues of the organized Jewish community. If you haven’t yet read them, you simply must see the evidence on the Jewish supremacy in media I have compiled in my books Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening.
The other great seat of establishment power is simply money, huge sums of money and the willingness to use those funds on behalf of an agenda. The biggest concentrations of wealth in the world today are in the Zionist international banks, and in financial groups that the Jews completely control such as the Federal Reserve Corporation, the same forces that have led us to the doorstep of a great depression. It is no accident that Alan Greenspan and Ben Shalom Bernanke are the last two of the Federal Reserve czars.
Even in days of World War I, an immensely rich, Jewish international banker, Jacob Schiff, voiced pride in the fact that he was instrumental in weakening Czarist Russia (the government that Jews universally hated), and that he supported Russia’s enemies so as to make Russia ripe for communist overthrow (Jewish groups brag of his help to Japan in the Russo-Japanese War so as to hurt the Russian government). Schiff also gave millions of dollars to directly finance the Jews who led and organized the Russian revolution and the Bolshevik terror in Russia. There is no disputing of these facts. Plenty of Jewish history books detail all of it.
So, frankly, financial power in the control of people who will use it for an agenda is also a key ingredient of real power. Again, the financial power in the hands of modern day Jacob Schiff’s, is an incredibly powerful weapon.
So forget about the “Military-Industrial Complex.” That is passe.
In today’s world it makes more sense to speak about the “Political, Financial and Media Zionist complex.” That is the real core of power that bends everything whether it be local laws, or giant corporations, to its will. Even if one of the world’s richest firms, such as Microsoft (which is now by the way run by a Jewish extremist), would buck the political, financial, and media Zionist complex, it would be broken by government fiat, the Jewish-influenced courts (such as anti-trust actions), and by vicious attacks by the Jewish-influenced media. Microsoft would either be dismembered or destroyed.
Such are the realities of the modern world.
There is no longer a “military industrial complex,” but there is a Political and media and financial Zionist complex that rules us and aims to control the whole world.
No single part of this behemoth can be defeated, because it can use its other assets to defend the section under attack. It can only be brought down by concentrating all our political and ideological fire right on the core the problem, International Zionism and its driving impetus: Jewish Supremacism.
—Dr. David Duke
—MORE–”
Yeah, about that last term:
I will not be commenting or highlighting too much on this next piece because it is an absolutely filthy piece of Zionist propaganda and rubbish. I will only that that it HURT ME — it LITERALLY HURT ME — to READ the article!! To think about going through it again in a post, ugh!
Just SOAK up the JEWISH — and more importantly, ZIONIST, a POLITICAL, not RELIGIOUS idea — SUPREMACY, will you?
Here is a little game you can play.
Take this quote
“Jewish philanthropy has an enormous impact on the American nonprofit scene – a study by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University found last year that 91 percent of Jews give to charity, making Jews far more charitable than most Christians – and the vast majority of Jewish giving goes to non-Jewish organizations, such as hospitals, museums, and universities.“
and see if you can find those OTHERS mentioned in the article. If so then YOU ARE BETTER DETECTIVE THAN ME (if you can get through the stinking superiority and arrogance)!
“Jewish leaders bracing for Madoff fallout; Charities face closings; anti-Semitism feared” by Michael Paulson, Globe Staff | December 22, 2008
The amount of money lost by Jewish charities in the Bernard L. Madoff scandal is staggering – $90 million by Hadassah, $110 million by Yeshiva University, and smaller amounts that have forced the closings of several foundations, including one on Boston’s North Shore.
The amount that has gone missing, compounded by the massive loss of wealth in the financial markets this fall, has led many Jewish community leaders to warn of a possible shakeout in the nonprofit world, as some organizations are forced to close or merge.
At the same time, some Jewish leaders are bracing for a backlash of anti-Semitism, which they believe is already being triggered by the very public focus on Jewish wealth and an alleged Jewish criminal.
Whine, whine, whine, whine, whine!
Go tell it to the Muslims you disparage and denigrate everyday!
Oh, and btw, there is NOTHING ALLEGED ABOUT IT, you lackluster excuse for a journalist: the GUY CONFESSED!!!! Is this how you are going to start out the “report?”
“To be a Jew, to live fully as a Jew, is to be a blessing to all humanity, and that calling, which dates back to God’s first conversation with Abraham, has taken a potentially catastrophic hit,” said Rabbi William Hamilton of Congregation Kehillath Israel in Brookline. “When one considers the number of philanthropies that have been dedicated to fulfilling that calling that have been crippled or destroyed by Mr. Madoff’s desecration of God’s name, I don’t believe we’ve even begun to appreciate the historic setback.”
Oh, that is DISGUSTING! That is RACIST and SUPREMACIST IDEOLOGY, my friends, and it is being PROMOTED by the “newspaper!” Of course, after I’m done here I use it for toilet paper (saves $$$).
And sorry, but I’m glad the poor, poor, Zionist pukes are set back! The evil scum can take a big, heaping helping of the medicine its dished out, ‘kay?
The Jewish Funders Network, an alliance of major Jewish foundations, has scheduled an emergency meeting of large family foundations tomorrow to discuss what to do next.
“There’s no question there will be a shakeout” among nonprofits, said Mark Charendoff, president of the organization. “There are organizations we will see, within the next couple of months, close down, and others will merge, and others will be changed forever.”
Jewish philanthropy has an enormous impact on the American nonprofit scene – a study by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University found last year that 91 percent of Jews give to charity, making Jews far more charitable than most Christians – and the vast majority of Jewish giving goes to non-Jewish organizations, such as hospitals, museums, and universities.
O.K. remember to play the game and LOOK for the OTHERS!
“They are among the most, if not the most, generous people in our community,” said Paul S. Grogan, president of The Boston Foundation.
Ummm, GO TELL IT to a PALESTINIAN! What an ABSOLUTE OUTRAGE of ARROGANCE!!!!!!!
“And every new revelation suggests that this is going to be far more serious than anyone thought. One gets the impression that a very large percentage of the successful philanthropic Jewish families in this community had some connection to Madoff.”
Many of the bold-faced names of the Jewish community, particularly in New York, Florida, and Massachusetts, have been caught up in the Madoff scandal. Locally, Carl and Ruth Shapiro, who have given about $60 million to Brandeis over the last decade and are funding two buildings under construction there, lost 40 to 45 percent of their foundation, which was worth $345 million at last report. A foundation established by Elie Wiesel, the BU professor and Nobel Peace Prize recipient, had invested almost all of its assets, $15.2 million, with Madoff. The Lappin Foundation, in Salem, closed after announcing that its assets had been invested with Madoff, and the Maimonides School, in Brookline, sent a letter to parents warning that a bequest that had been supporting its operating budget was invested with Madoff.
Nationally, in addition to the losses by Hadassah and Yeshiva, there are scores of affected Jewish philanthropies. The Picower Foundation of Florida, which in 2007 declared assets of $955 million that included multiple Jewish institutions and causes among its beneficiaries, on Friday said it had invested with Madoff and would be forced to close. Last week, the Chais Family Foundation, founded in California but located in Jerusalem, which claimed $178 million in assets and gave primarily to Jewish causes in Israel and the United States, also closed. The American Technion Society, which supports a science university in Israel, lost $72 million with Madoff, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. And there are many more.
I keep waiting for the OTHER CAUSES, the NON-JEWISH CAUSES that are geetting the VASY MAJORITY of the JEW CHARITY!!
So far, all I see is the $$$ going BACK to ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!
The crisis has so unsettled Jewish philanthropy that even institutions not directly affected have begun issuing statements to try to reassure supporters. Hebrew College in Newton sent a letter declaring its investments Madoff-free; the Rashi School in Newton did the same. Both institutions, like many smaller Jewish institutions in Greater Boston, invest through a community endowment pool managed by Combined Jewish Philanthropies, which did not invest with Madoff.
In addition to the losses suffered by other foundations and charities, there is a large indirect impact because many of the organizations that did not have money invested with Madoff depend on donors who did. But in recent days a handful of voices have emerged suggesting that some of the dire talk might be overblown.
Yeah, KEEP MINIMIZING tjis PIECE of SCITTE THIEF and Lord help you if you ever INVESTIGATED WHO WORKED FOR HIM!!!
“In the scope of Jewish philanthropy, the Madoff affair is more devastating psychologically and emotionally than it is financially,” said Gary A. Tobin, president of the Institute for Jewish & Community Research, in San Francisco.
Awww, the POOR, POOR, “psychologically and emotionally” devastated Jews!!
HOW SICKENINGLY REVOLTING!!! Yup, NO ONE SUFFERS as much as JEWS, and if you happen to be a VICTIM of NaZionist a**holes like the Israelis, well, you don’t have psychological problems, you have anger issues!
You get ABSOLUTELY SICK and TIRED of it after a while, folks!!!
“Jews give away a minimum of $5 billion a year to Jewish causes alone, and much more than that to non-Jewish causes, so if we add up maybe a billion dollars that’s been lost, and you look at the tens of billions that are sitting in Jewish foundations and the annual operating budgets of Jewish philanthropies, this is serious, hurtful, and painful, but not devastating.”
O.K., let’s HEAR ABOUT SOME of them!!! I’m STILL WAITING!!
Barry Shrage, the president of Combined Jewish Philanthropies, is also urging caution.
“It seems hard to believe that this could affect more than one percent of donors, or even one percent of major donors,” Shrage said. “This is a massive piece of economic news, on top of a lot of other bad economic news, but the Jewish people have been through a lot in 3,500 years, and this is not the time to panic.”
I mean, are you ‘effin’ kidding?
Yup, it’s always the POOR, POOR, NaZionists and ZioNazis!!!!!!
(Blog author is so outraged by the smug superiority and arrogant racism that he thinks it best not to reply right now)
Btw, just exactly WHO is REPRESSING the Jews right now? NO ONE THAT I CAN SEE! They aren’t hurting anywhere (except for Holocaust survivors being given the shit-end of the stick by the Israeli government)!!!!!
Even the Shapiro Foundation, which gave away about $80 million over the last decade but says it had invested between 40 and 45 percent of its assets with Madoff, said it is hoping to avoid reducing donations. “We really are committed to building back the resources as a foundation and anticipate that the foundation will continue to be a strong supporter of the region’s nonprofits for many years to come,” said foundation spokeswoman Diana C. Pisciotta.
But recipients are on edge. “Any college or art institution that relies on the support of philanthropies and benefactors has to be concerned about the future,” said Dennis Nealon, a spokesman for Brandeis University. The school, like many nonprofits that benefit from Jewish philanthropy, holds an annual benefit in Palm Beach; this year it has scaled back the event to just a lecture, canceling the social components because of concern about the post-Madoff climate.
So where are the NON-JEWISH RECIPIENTS of SUCH Jewish largesse?
I’m STILL WAITING!
Some observers say that the Jewish philanthropic world will not be uniformly affected. Those who invested with Madoff appear to have been older, and experts say that older Jewish donors have tended to focus their giving more on established organizations and, within the Jewish community, on “defensive” organizations that battle anti-Semitism. Younger donors, who grew up after the Holocaust and the founding of the state of Israel, have tended to favor smaller and more innovative organizations.
Translation: the OLD ZIONIST JEWS are the ones who got took, and the YOUNG JEWS are either not interested in the Zionist dogma or are DROPPING OUT of the religion altogether! So, OLD MONEY ZIONISTS got RIPPED OFF by Bernie, huh? Ha-ha-ha!
“One thing that’s not sufficiently understood is that the people who are involved in this are disproportionately older, and enormously loyal to the Jewish community,” said Jonathan Sarna, a Brandeis professor.
But they are giving WAY MORE to NON-JEWISH CHARITIES!
C’mon, will you at least NAME ONE, MSM?
“If that generation has now been wiped out of money, we’re going to see a real change, because the people who made their money in high-tech weren’t affected at all, and the younger Jews don’t even understand how you could have given that much money to one guy.”
“Oh… this just makes me feel the spirit of the season. I know it’s shameful. I know it diminishes me. I know more people won’t like me even more now“
ME, too!!!!
Some Jewish leaders are concerned about a possible rise in anti-Semitism.
Yup, CALL OUT the BIG DOGS!!!
“It becomes grist for the anti-Semitic mill,” said Rabbi Ronne Friedman of Temple Israel in Boston. “In this instance, there’s a double indemnity – the Jewish community has really been wounded by a Jewish guy, and that’s not going to stop folks who are anti-Semitic from using it as their evidence for Jew hatred.”
You know, if the SHOE (given a whole new context because of that Iraqi fella, SMILE!) FITS, then WEAR IT, ZioNazi!!!!
I COVERED the “anti-semite” chrge at the top!
The Anti-Defamation League has been monitoring blogs and comment boards and finds a substantial number of anti-Jewish comments.
Hey, ADL!! See THIS?
“Anti-Semitic comments tended to focus on Jewish greed and thievery, as well as conspiracy theories linking these losses to Israel,” the ADL said in an analysis.
Just CHECK OUT MY LINKS, bro!! The BLOGS will UNCOVER whatever you try to hide, NaZionist scum! This AIN’T 1949 NO MORE!!!!!!!!!!!
Several Jewish community leaders and observers say they are worried about other indirect effects of the scandal – the potential erosion of trust within the community and a potential chilling effect on giving.
That is GONE FOREVER with me, you band of lying, land-stealing, mass-murdering, genocidal, ZioNazi pieces of filth!
“People who have considerable wealth have been acting like they’re going to run out of money, and that fear piece becomes really the biggest contention that the fund-raising nonprofit world has to deal with,” said H. Peter Karoff, chairman and founder of The Philanthropic Initiative, a Boston-based nonprofit that advises donors. “People are just traumatized.”
Awww, the POOR, (almost) PENNILESS, TRAUMATIZED JEWS!!
Gimme that airsick bag, will ya?
—more–“
Oh, and WHERE are the NON-JEWISH CHARITIES that are SO GRATEFUL to receive the JEWISH LARGESSE?
They NEVER EVEN NAMED ONE, did they?
Is my Zionist-controlled, agenda-pushing, war-promoting, supremacy-advocating, piece-of-crap, AmeriKan War Daily something or what?
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »
“Do The Jews Own Hollywood And The Media?
—MORE–“
Also see: Can you spot the odd one out?
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: msm, usa | Leave a comment »
AmeriKan News Monitor 